ON 20061101@10:31:31 PM at page:
http://www.sxlist.com/scenix/index.htm#39022.7086111111
James Newton[JMN-EFP-786] removed post 39022.7086111111
|Delete 'vikalex80@mail.ru shares this code: "
/techref/scenix/
Hallo! site the best! :)
"
'
ON 20061103@9:35:17 AM at page:
http://www.sxlist.com/scenix/index.htm#39023.8943055556
James Newton[JMN-EFP-786] removed post 39023.8943055556
|Delete 'vikalex80@mail.ru "
/techref/scenix/
Hallo! site the best! :)"
'
ON 20061103@10:22:02 AM at page:
http://www.sxlist.com/techref/scenix/clocks.htm#37683.4759143519
James Newton[JMN-EFP-786] Replied to post 37683.4759143519 by gregb
|Insert 'Update: Ubicom has passed the SX chips to Parallax, Inc. (makers of the popular BASIC STAMP) and so the future of the SX is assured.' at: ''
gregb@laserlab.com asks:
I was under the impression that Ubicom had abandoned support
for the SX processors. Furthermore, they seem to be hard to
get, and quite expensive. I do have an SX-KEY and SX-Tech
development system, but have been shying away from the SX chips
because they seem to be fading away.
I welcome comments.
James Newton replies: Nope, Ubicom supports the SX chips nicely, thank you. There have been some shortages, but they are available and the cost is not bad at all considering what you get. I don't think they will fade away until there is another microcontroller than can run at 75 MIPS!