Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 00:26:48 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 19L7FeVA001299; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 03:16:51 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-7.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.58]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 19L7FcRV001296 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 03:15:38 -0400 Received: from w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.15]) by outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 19L7Fcw5004116 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 03:15:38 -0400 Received: from w92expo17.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.71) by w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.24; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 03:15:23 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.112) by w92expo17.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 03:15:37 -0400 Received: from NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.59.169) by oc11exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.24 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 03:15:37 -0400 Received: from BN9P223CA0019.NAMP223.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10b6:408:10b::24) by SN2PR01MB1999.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:804:f::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4608.16; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 07:15:30 +0000 Received: from BN8NAM11FT059.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:10b:cafe::20) by BN9P223CA0019.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:408:10b::24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4628.15 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 07:15:29 +0000 Received: from mail-pg1-f180.google.com (209.85.215.180) by BN8NAM11FT059.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.177.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4628.16 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 07:15:29 +0000 Received: by mail-pg1-f180.google.com with SMTP id q187so1359880pgq.2 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 00:15:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Richard Prosser To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 00:15:17 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE]: Calculating phase shift in high voltage A/C distribution cable Thread-Topic: [EE]: Calculating phase shift in high voltage A/C distribution cable Thread-Index: AdfGTQKDKoirQiVqRtWL2drn7Iy71g== Message-ID: References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.215.180 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.215.180; helo=mail-pg1-f180.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=IbPmsWyPy79k1JpwnzJL2nvJmu72u7rPXJ3TAfZW9mk=; b=QEm1aWB0MwmlLFJ6RTkdQy1L48aVpur90Y9vrWSy2/kW5gVPlzIAcQy7xvdGxoClX/ NgJhVZg8ClF7/AV3pcNE7/KtvF2W2VYeaK2knyBTglKx36imls8JY5RwMSIIMU69gJw9 C4M4geWSxwDUaRbBPLt95yblWfThtkFtLKlnlqHgmpGJs2an7QFnJWahq1vig8q06GC5 92xmMrY+wsK6grAK33VSFh+dlplwOj6zbVjubE2nOkMrjvF/hIfHv8oNNGeDciQIXSZo iAtE/P/Bai7I2EYrYzjq29WahuFSijC652O4KqwvR+5W7TNBLkBxIYKf0eiFjHAPsl5z wuPw== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.215.180) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a63:b609:: with SMTP id j9mr3113023pgf.132.1634800528583; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 00:15:28 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [EE] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 For a polyethylene cable, Vp is likely to be around 0.67,(crosslinked poly may be slightly lower ~0.65?) If it's PVC the Vp will be still lower, maybe 0.5 but varies with frequency - not an issue in your case. Otherwise your calculation looks about right. (0.9 degrees if Vp =3D 0.67). But this is for the difference between the 2 feeds - ie one feed is 10km longer than the other, assuming the same source supply and there are no phase inversions (eg at transformers) etc. RP On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 at 14:05, Justin Richards wrote: > I think for RF there are coax cable constants for Vp or Vf which I am > guessing is Velocity of Propagation or Velocity Factor. > > However, with High Voltage A/C @ 50Hz does the question of phase shift > make sense. > > And if so, what would be a typical value for Vp or Vf. > > I ask as it appears that there was a situation where there were two ring > mains fed from each end with no "opens" and thus the way I see it is the > output of each HV step up transformer would be connected to each other vi= a > a long length of cable. > > Assuming two identical transformers (which will not be the case), I would > guess that if the outputs were directly connected at the transformers the= n > hypothetically no big deal. No sparks, no increase in load etc. (again > assuming the connections were around the right way) > > However, if the interconnecting cable was extended then I am guessing as > the length increased the phase shift would increase and the two > transformers would be fighting each other. > > Does that sound reasonable. And if so, how do I calculate phase shift ov= er > the cable at 50Hz. Can I assume a Vp of 1, or Velocity of propagation as > the speed of light. > > So 33uS over 10kms ~ > @50Hz, T is 20mS (360 degrees) > Phase shift =3D (33uS/20mS)*360 > ~ 0.6 deg phase over 10kms. > > Am I way off. > > Welcome any insights anyone may have. > > Regards Justin > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .