From: mike brown <mike@n5qmg.com>
To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. <piclist@mit.edu>
Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" <piclist-bounces@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:14:42 -0700
Subject: Re: [EE] Oscilloscope help, Siglent, Rigol, etc
Thread-Topic: [EE] Oscilloscope help, Siglent, Rigol, etc
Thread-Index: AdepnlAw3ceLbR39RsKTorUZvt3Syw==
Message-ID:
 <CADHfTmO-qqNOCZazeqYMgdmM0w4p_UgTSqg4t_Q44kkzuJ-kuA@mail.gmail.com>
References:
 <SJ0PR02MB7662A699521FE193D5A14C22DCDA9@SJ0PR02MB7662.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To:
 <SJ0PR02MB7662A699521FE193D5A14C22DCDA9@SJ0PR02MB7662.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. <piclist@mit.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: n5qmg.com does not designate
	permitted sender hosts)
dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=n5qmg-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
	h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 	bh=z1tGIcMnh4X40KzXJXgnP2/mFjte6ZQMod2NAu4cSKM=;
	b=syg7wnkX0fWUpuL3v9gAlAI7ln7CKPI4Z4Dx55jhdlOYbGO+EssIX4ZdOzGCkHKcnD
	4rYozfcgsHOeqypiOdHBLsJTbV6FBsHLjHPVQSX/W+Qe6alHl9w1/E0AMdfWMHK/xZvU
	psMA3RS+K46ZSRszXTj3xmucmcgZ6jgba78Qlklugfld02dZNub7NQ+8PmePO4CeJ8pn
	gra7Fa+qNBnQnsx5Wf6PX0Lw7Hg1aYu9ZnZaZVmTOfqKZYoUc9WWBXlXpjAhE9DcAW2z
	unG9wnE6dPdhUqFjJ4SlYdLHxephzPeF1IeDkPhqBTqAYT0TxeObiEk7Psz6ZGKs6xZo	cm/A==
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is 209.85.222.178)
	smtp.mailfrom=n5qmg.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified)
	header.d=n5qmg-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; mit.edu;	dmarc=none action=none
 header.from=n5qmg.com;
errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu
list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." <piclist.mit.edu>
list-post: <mailto:piclist@mit.edu>
x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu
x-mailman-version: 2.1.6
x-received: by 2002:a05:620a:1525:: with SMTP id
	n5mr6566390qkk.386.1631646894177; 	Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
x-topics: [EE]
x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

I watched a bunch of videos on the MSO5000 series.  It's an awesome scope
starting around $1000.  Trigger and decode features galore.

On Tue, Sep 14, 2021, 12:03 Bob Blick <bobblick@outlook.com> wrote:

> Hi Dr Skip,
>
> I don't have experience with either of those two models, but I did buy a
> cheap Hantek a few years ago, simply to have something small on my home
> workbench. I hated it. A year later I sold it at a garage sale for next t=
o
> nothing after telling the guy I didn't like it, but he wanted it bad so I
> took his money. I replaced it with a Rigol DS1054Z which is quite adequat=
e.
> But after having it a few years I notice its shortcomings and they line u=
p
> with some things that I have read on the net, particularly wrt FFT. The
> Siglents are supposed to be vastly superior in that regard. Something to
> consider. The main thing that bugs me about day-to-day operation of the
> Rigol is the action of the knobs. There is a small range of speeds you ca=
n
> turn them or your motion is ignored or delayed or jerky.
>
> Friendly regards, Bob
> --
> http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>
--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.