From: Bob Blick <bobblick@outlook.com>
To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. <piclist@mit.edu>
Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" <piclist-bounces@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:53:54 -0700
Subject: RE: [EE] Oscilloscope help, Siglent, Rigol, etc
Thread-Topic: [EE] Oscilloscope help, Siglent, Rigol, etc
Thread-Index: AQHXqYZ/d+PiWHsKIEaYpW2VC+oOzQ==
Message-ID:
 <SJ0PR02MB7662A699521FE193D5A14C22DCDA9@SJ0PR02MB7662.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. <piclist@mit.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of outlook.com designates
	40.92.23.33 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
	client-ip=40.92.23.33;	helo=NAM12-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com; 
dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com;
	s=selector1;
	h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;
	bh=QkEgRfrMQvDcWWNRfLhePTpjtFmFoL1YLXfldqbQru0=;
	b=gUL5lAx8CDpAtMaIA1uJfeU+EP7qBT1Gs/C0+iNCMkBwNIJgbkpCh1Pz72lnHbpCaYPfeeZFwF1HGTthx79pWYD/zGsF11Rg3qKTs99+1v07dd1mMi7aZi/QxVopQPv11OKVaq1s3lWOSinCP8tv2JwmLMlT0kq+Ry/RnQ8poT2tU0hWSNXz/6iHzuMfpcf2/d87+hXglJQXIx1HAd3f63gAITgpLmXTbg2EkuNDlKNqUF+50FxOGgM9aTab34iEspH8IgIzvFK0XKY9v5q8pUIf8BlMOXBjYL6aXiGy0cOBmsFjnSaz8OXLbGjiDyf8D5n8guquEDnbYeuzD1y1hA==
authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 40.92.23.33)
	smtp.mailfrom=outlook.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified)
	header.d=outlook.com; mit.edu;	dmarc=pass action=none
 header.from=outlook.com; 
errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu
list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." <piclist.mit.edu>
list-post: <mailto:piclist@mit.edu>
x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu
x-mailman-version: 2.1.6
x-topics: [EE]
x-mime-autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by PCH.mit.edu id
	18EGsgSG006419
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

Hi Dr Skip,

I don't have experience with either of those two models, but I did buy a ch=
eap Hantek a few years ago, simply to have something small on my home workb=
ench. I hated it. A year later I sold it at a garage sale for next to nothi=
ng after telling the guy I didn't like it, but he wanted it bad so I took h=
is money. I replaced it with a Rigol DS1054Z which is quite adequate. But a=
fter having it a few years I notice its shortcomings and they line up with =
some things that I have read on the net, particularly wrt FFT. The Siglents=
 are supposed to be vastly superior in that regard. Something to consider. =
The main thing that bugs me about day-to-day operation of the Rigol is the =
action of the knobs. There is a small range of speeds you can turn them or =
your motion is ignored or delayed or jerky.

Friendly regards, Bob
--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.