Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Sat, 4 Sep 2021 11:16:35 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 184I5xNn005464; Sat, 4 Sep 2021 14:06:52 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-5.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.59]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 184I5wMI005461 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2021 14:05:58 -0400 Received: from w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.15]) by outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 184I5vID007652 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2021 14:05:58 -0400 Received: from OC11EXPO27.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.98) by w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23; Sat, 4 Sep 2021 14:05:11 -0400 Received: from w92exhyb2.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.32) by OC11EXPO27.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23; Sat, 4 Sep 2021 14:05:03 -0400 Received: from NAM04-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.73.177) by w92exhyb2.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 4 Sep 2021 14:05:02 -0400 Received: from DM5PR17CA0062.namprd17.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:13f::24) by BL0PR01MB4548.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:208:8e::30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4478.22; Sat, 4 Sep 2021 18:05:55 +0000 Received: from DM6NAM11FT019.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:13f:cafe::3f) by DM5PR17CA0062.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:3:13f::24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4478.17 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 4 Sep 2021 18:05:55 +0000 Received: from mail-lf1-f46.google.com (209.85.167.46) by DM6NAM11FT019.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.172.172) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4478.19 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 4 Sep 2021 18:05:55 +0000 Received: by mail-lf1-f46.google.com with SMTP id m28so4929073lfj.6 for ; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 11:05:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Sean Breheny To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 11:05:42 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] Looking for op-amp recommendations Thread-Topic: [EE] Looking for op-amp recommendations Thread-Index: AdehuP81AsGUSZz7RDm3kFDjVvkKCQ== Message-ID: References: <61326986.1c69fb81.709cb.077c@mx.google.com> List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: <61326986.1c69fb81.709cb.077c@mx.google.com> Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: TempError X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.167.46 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.167.46; helo=mail-lf1-f46.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cornell.edu; s=g.20171207; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=9zVtGC1zHnYRCBQ4NcCcYoM43qUnG1AmujiP3joUspM=; b=hHXxUylCNESBI5dh62alZF9jlnoDIlqh6nikxXxwuY6bDbrki+zb93zzBMrwGciUgy 7DlPzx+dX8YXmvn55HsdzxpoZ+huaLbBzH3Z17cgRjiUzwqac3s5yUiZteg8i/bk5y7t T3fZhwAC6OHlXHW9eFLp6poJyb9rZr/c48obfCcAe6v5wr0UR2XLIvzLImxzmil+ww0c EWeVXNcMcwrXYr2/KY2NxdwJBCjKChqCvaUZCL7oD8lKBeVKdoekwXl/WCUPfvzRFYAP DqZFc33yaVQq9rTo8YP5YMLnmgZbPh+Ym/VcCZpLQdu3LSEzs4HUFx9JUF1rYE4FYGw4 tnmA== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.167.46) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=cornell.edu; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cornell.edu; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a05:6512:951:: with SMTP id u17mr3564601lft.392.1630778753955; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 11:05:53 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [EE] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 One of my favorite go-to op-amps is the LMC6482/6484. I think it would meet your specs although it is not likely the least expensive one that does. It is CMOS-based so the input bias current is phenomenally low - but you do pay for that in terms of cost. Output is true rail-to-rail if the current is low enough. Sean On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 2:31 PM Dwayne Reid wrote: > Good day to all. > > I'm starting a new project and am looking for an upgraded > LM324. That is: quad op-amp available in both DIP as well as SOIC > package, better input offset specs than the LM324, higher GBW than > the LM324. This will be operating from a 12 Vdc supply. > > There are tens of thousands of candidates available and I am asking > for help in narrowing that down to a few choices that I can examine in > detail. > > I can also use dual or even single op-amps but the quad fits the > project perfectly. > > I would ask on Electronics.Stack Exchange but I think that requests > for product recommendations are strictly verboten. > > Many thanks! > > dwayne > > -- > Dwayne Reid > Trinity Electronics Systems Ltd Edmonton, AB, CANADA > 780-489-3199 voice 780-487-6397 fax 888-489-3199 Toll Free > www.trinity-electronics.com > Custom Electronics Design and Manufacturing > > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .