From: David VanHorn <microbrix@gmail.com>
To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. <piclist@mit.edu>
Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" <piclist-bounces@mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 12:37:25 -0700
Subject: Re: [EE] Looking for op-amp recommendations
Thread-Topic: [EE] Looking for op-amp recommendations
Thread-Index: Adeg/LCXkb/TDKnzT4G1IA9A1NgAMQ==
Message-ID:
 <CAB115wEYErARkRwyJk=sjDfL7+b=vaYO5VMykerb4+Vyfihhvg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <61326986.1c69fb81.709cb.077c@mx.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <61326986.1c69fb81.709cb.077c@mx.google.com>
Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. <piclist@mit.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates
	209.85.166.172 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
	client-ip=209.85.166.172; helo=mail-il1-f172.google.com;
dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com;
 s=20210112;
	h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 	bh=TK3d2VrcWplhbM+xfBNHAfkF8SK5Z2HpPXtNN9q3Jm8=;
	b=m1rIKzCwYdPQaowgLf3qbHq+F+zmpLffFHzMQnFZSXDH5k54AieElZnirmGeuOFKJ7
	zEDIrCdMqOiKEDawpEJANrmiaKdGRXYuxbbGdwrjY4ZLVVudyFAV3nlIh3JTriJKwx9l
	v1WLmmBwVL42AgcGigTYy88Q25DWw6g+UI5Ip5Iuc520y1K7AuLm+fbJmzKQDUZkyz8k
	y82gZS1iIh0paLRoG2XRKvSOR43vA9l7UCpqgzMmpYHC3ktulnLQSiapuu3OvHGwst6L
	KwMISRUj1jIRCSBZcuJgaiXYvU0k6FA/RuWA0eDlM330KdEoLQ5RVM2t5+Vblh0ugpzs	nwmw==
authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.166.172)
	smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified)
	header.d=gmail.com; mit.edu;	dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com; 
errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu
list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." <piclist.mit.edu>
list-post: <mailto:piclist@mit.edu>
x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu
x-mailman-version: 2.1.6
x-received: by 2002:a92:cda2:: with SMTP id g2mr300333ild.135.1630697854076;
	Fri, 03 Sep 2021 12:37:34 -0700 (PDT)
x-topics: [EE]
x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

You're still pretty broad.  The TL074 opamps are nice.

How much GBP do you need, and at what frequency?


Bob Pease of national semiconductor once said: "National makes lots of good
opamps.  The 324 is not one of them".
He could get away with stuff like that.


On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 12:31 PM Dwayne Reid <dwayner@planet.eon.net> wrote:

> Good day to all.
>
> I'm starting a new project and am looking for an upgraded
> LM324.  That is: quad op-amp available in both DIP as well as SOIC
> package, better input offset specs than the LM324, higher GBW than
> the LM324.  This will be operating from a 12 Vdc supply.
>
> There are tens of thousands of candidates available and I am asking
> for help in narrowing that down to a few choices that I can examine in
> detail.
>
> I can also use dual or even single op-amps but the quad fits the
> project perfectly.
>
> I would ask on Electronics.Stack Exchange but I think that requests
> for product recommendations are strictly verboten.
>
> Many thanks!
>
> dwayne
>
> --
> Dwayne Reid   <dwayner@planet.eon.net>
> Trinity Electronics Systems Ltd    Edmonton, AB, CANADA
> 780-489-3199 voice   780-487-6397 fax   888-489-3199 Toll Free
> www.trinity-electronics.com
> Custom Electronics Design and Manufacturing
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>
--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.