Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 15:10:07 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 17IM0fpB030432; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 18:01:21 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-7.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.58]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 17IM0dmJ030426 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 18:00:39 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE2.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.18]) by outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 17IM0T6Z008444 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 18:00:39 -0400 Received: from w92expo11.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.65) by oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 18:00:27 -0400 Received: from w92exhyb1.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.12) by w92expo11.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.65) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 18:00:21 -0400 Received: from NAM11-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.58.169) by w92exhyb1.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 18:00:21 -0400 Received: from DM5PR16CA0034.namprd16.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:15::20) by BN6PR01MB2484.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:404:53::11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4415.16; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 22:00:34 +0000 Received: from DM6NAM11FT062.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:15:cafe::7a) by DM5PR16CA0034.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:4:15::20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4436.19 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 22:00:34 +0000 Received: from mail-wr1-f49.google.com (209.85.221.49) by DM6NAM11FT062.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.173.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4436.19 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 22:00:34 +0000 Received: by mail-wr1-f49.google.com with SMTP id u16so5779167wrn.5 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 15:00:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from raspberry (cpc113460-oxfd27-2-0-cust322.4-3.cable.virginm.net. [86.24.157.67]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p8sm5896988wme.22.2021.08.18.15.00.33 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 18 Aug 2021 15:00:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan Pearce To: "piclist@mit.edu" Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 15:00:29 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] off the shelf TRIAC module? Thread-Topic: [EE] off the shelf TRIAC module? Thread-Index: AdeUfc4Vh3YJk0XJTneSvN36BO8l5w== Message-ID: <20210818230029.25e0f06b@raspberry> References: <611d6547.1c69fb81.3600f.2722@mx.google.com> <611d7dd3.1c69fb81.7db94.3488@mx.google.com> List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: <611d7dd3.1c69fb81.7db94.3488@mx.google.com> Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of googlemail.com designates 209.85.221.49 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.221.49; helo=mail-wr1-f49.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:organization :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YChNQs2kbAY8nDgqYqZkl5/n+h35QlcuklQA/31y0Q4=; b=eam6EHbV3jUYKoa+VKJh0maqbwQ3XN7ohinh1d/IQjUFhr/KEjqUvxeBASBHUSuQL3 YChm3ETm98mDJH9nGMLCS6KZJg2au78VrOE6HKxkMgmZ3CtMj2RT1X1ubeLhamSNvB/y CVsvN/tuOi1kq3M+zXm3l0nkBjz25HSgEM+QcqKMYrmR/sO1vYOMPX5pefBb/J1fT/Xw psNveaDDrkAYtg2jxxtN5crTw3eExJ21Di6dMPbNqbcHcprZ3bBlmtOftREelDxaoHIL QgSj7JaLtlEqZ7P1sq+8lN/kICmRJPFWyPBommSA+kuq8nJ+TAj5gRSA5iJI2tbaG8Yy 6Suw== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.221.49) smtp.mailfrom=googlemail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=googlemail.com;mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=googlemail.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a5d:668c:: with SMTP id l12mr13150419wru.84.1629324033285; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 15:00:33 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [EE] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 On Wed, 18 Aug 2021 15:38:27 -0600 Dwayne Reid wrote: > ... You=20 > can also get PID modules that are intended for integral-cycle=20 > control, where you would use a SSR with zero-cross switching. >=20 > So many possibilities! I had dealings with such a controller a couple of years ago. It needed to be set up so the minimum pulse width to the SSR was one half of the sinewave period. But the controller was then intelligent enough to skip cycles as you got to very low percentages of on time or needed to do fancy things to get an accurate average percentage. We were using it with heaters on a black body calibration unit that had significant mass (as in about 40kg of aluminium) so the long time scales of skipped half cycles were not a problem but we needed the fine percentage resolution (the unit needed to be stable to millikelvin once at operating point). --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .