From: Jim Ruxton <jim.ruxton@gmail.com>
To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. <piclist@mit.edu>
Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" <piclist-bounces@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 12:31:59 -0700
Subject: Re: [EE] PCB manufacturer not wanting to put UL 94V-0 mark on boards
Thread-Topic: [EE] PCB manufacturer not wanting to put UL 94V-0 mark on
 boards
Thread-Index: AdeUaUw0v9oaLjWgSkWknZtaUAnhrg==
Message-ID:
 <CAPQ66MT0_=B9Atvc-Uqt0YOurZYo91NLXhuXp1jAkdQMjJM9dQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <611d4447.1c69fb81.5395c.1877@mx.google.com>
	<20210818185107.0d61286e@raspberry>
In-Reply-To: <20210818185107.0d61286e@raspberry>
Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. <piclist@mit.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates
	209.85.166.181 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
	client-ip=209.85.166.181; helo=mail-il1-f181.google.com;
dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com;
 s=20161025;
	h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 	bh=iAvDxbXE1/Xw3/xYaKGfANtjVkX7jKZs98NwYMXc1lA=;
	b=OqZ+GoKfLJTSvBHXM0JghXRN+xalI9dqthinWPvPPzqWbU+WMHR5W3+F89Y2BbpGDC
	Jl8j6ZlR6ujS5w9rs+M2Y0jRtyh0ejg0w9JufhTOn9v9MbBExLNzC0T1GPzl/Zi8wvGC
	4UaSHzLDMK1KmLRPXsI+SEHnBLVsISG2vBn9ciw7zP1Drbcq8hQOYzSnVNr7klW9YXfN
	biw33oSmmYfOu1H4PsQUwV/oeM7XAFbYSbUisbGdtaxYF45FZJKSrCDNGIfOlWoa+WSF
	/BGkSxv+Kj2hBzGWzCxv6VyQy4I9zInzMmP1gxE+QEyGsxhqPRx7OjIG3ARBBptVaHxq	2+Tw==
authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.166.181)
	smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified)
	header.d=gmail.com; mit.edu;	dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com; 
errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu
list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." <piclist.mit.edu>
list-post: <mailto:piclist@mit.edu>
x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu
x-mailman-version: 2.1.6
x-received: by 2002:a92:6a0f:: with SMTP id
 f15mr7096811ilc.195.1629315130741; 	Wed, 18 Aug 2021 12:32:10 -0700 (PDT)
x-topics: [EE]
x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

Not an answer to your question but there is a very active JLCPCB Facebook
group where a lot of people discuss and resolve issues about the service.
The moderator appears to work at JLCPCB and is very responsive.
Jim

On Wed., Aug. 18, 2021, 1:52 p.m. Alan Pearce, <
kiwiantipodean@googlemail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 18 Aug 2021 11:32:55 -0600
> Dwayne Reid <dwayner@planet.eon.net> wrote:
> ...
> > What I'm asking for is a reality check.  Is it reasonable for me to
> > specify that the PCB material must be UL certified **AND** that the
> > PCB manufacturer must add the UL mark to the boards when they are
> > manufactured?
> >
> > How do I go about ensuring that JLCPCB does what I ask?
> >
> > Opinions greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Many thanks!
> >
> > dwayne
> >
>
> Have you tried asking them for a certificate for the material they use?
>
> Do you make a specific area for them to put the UL mark on the PCB
> silkscreen and indicate this in your documentation? I do recall leaving
> an area specifically marked in the supplied documentation as being for
> "manufacturer production trace information" or words to similar effect
> which was never a problem with manufacturers we used - but they were
> used to the requirement as it was required as part of their ESA
> certification :)
>
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>
--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.