Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 01:10:58 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 1787xAbm007130; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 04:00:14 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.15]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 1787x9kX007127 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 03:59:09 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE2.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.18]) by outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 1787x9kO017996 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 03:59:09 -0400 Received: from oc11expo25.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.96) by oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 03:58:40 -0400 Received: from w92exhyb6.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.111) by oc11expo25.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.96) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 03:59:08 -0400 Received: from NAM02-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.57.43) by w92exhyb6.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 03:59:08 -0400 Received: from BN9PR03CA0119.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:fd::34) by DM6PR01MB5580.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:5:156::12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4394.19; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 07:59:02 +0000 Received: from BN8NAM11FT044.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:fd:cafe::87) by BN9PR03CA0119.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:408:fd::34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4394.15 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 07:59:01 +0000 Received: from mail-pj1-f48.google.com (209.85.216.48) by BN8NAM11FT044.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.177.219) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4394.16 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 07:59:01 +0000 Received: by mail-pj1-f48.google.com with SMTP id u5-20020a17090ae005b029017842fe8f82so15554006pjy.0 for ; Sun, 08 Aug 2021 00:59:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Justin Richards To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2021 00:58:46 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] Latching relay ratings Thread-Topic: [EE] Latching relay ratings Thread-Index: AdeMLOu4mzVeAZqLTv+4bJbGd6SNeg== Message-ID: References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.216.48; helo=mail-pj1-f48.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=J0iwgyZtlxTSUTyGSEo7mnXY6mOItqhsnrjPkxxEMvM=; b=jhoy7gMr+2KzkRVWKa5uJxNnIAdJXmSoT8yHVtsJCj3qX23dY8jW1PxqclanopCprr OJd8/n2HlDQ6KqBa0qj6vNfNQ/dgltGHppvqL9ZThpR15ucgLE5vIAJWv/rRZ7U8sFZu wsnuCN29ISHH3r6rEwR6FfPtg+QOxKknUpeDtcyBUEcDlB8/HdD9Fz5gFVeI/8i7ak79 +aiLceRLIvlEDF1eE1Yozex8UXnp/pjSyPbRvCR5wrwQGUhoWT81MbxcyDdLbbQGTjD2 qymx7LVe4XU4YrUmNF30GUTLeJjzQb7sGvrA56IiPT4VMwfF6z4Z4zYG/SORqj9co7nk n7aA== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.216.48) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a17:902:b218:b029:11a:bf7b:1a80 with SMTP id t24-20020a170902b218b029011abf7b1a80mr1327062plr.82.1628409540723; Sun, 08 Aug 2021 00:59:00 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [EE] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Re Glass FET's, I have heard them referred to as a FET with a pilot light. I know very little about these and never considered that they had a ohmic region, does that imply they also have a saturated region where they dissipate less heat? On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 3:45 AM David Van Horn < david.vanhorn@backcountryaccess.com> wrote: > Amusing analogy: I've heard tubes called glass FETs, and you could think > of relays as Mech-FETs. > You don't want to spend time in the ohmic region. > > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .