Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 17:37:53 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 1760QkVn014249; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 20:27:51 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-7.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.58]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 1760Qi82014246 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 20:26:45 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE2.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.18]) by outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 1760QiXs031029 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 20:26:44 -0400 Received: from w92expo23.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.77) by oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 20:26:18 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.60) by w92expo23.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.77) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 20:26:00 -0400 Received: from NAM11-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.58.169) by oc11exhyb1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 20:26:43 -0400 Received: from BN9P220CA0030.NAMP220.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10b6:408:13e::35) by BYAPR01MB4360.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:a03:97::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4394.15; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 00:26:42 +0000 Received: from BN8NAM11FT059.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:13e:cafe::20) by BN9P220CA0030.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:408:13e::35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4394.15 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 00:26:42 +0000 Received: from mail-lf1-f48.google.com (209.85.167.48) by BN8NAM11FT059.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.177.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4394.16 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 00:26:42 +0000 Received: by mail-lf1-f48.google.com with SMTP id f42so14491091lfv.7 for ; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 17:26:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Sean Breheny To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 17:26:29 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] Latching relay ratings Thread-Topic: [EE] Latching relay ratings Thread-Index: AdeKW0uPcj9jxfjTR+6/q1OXGjYQRA== Message-ID: References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.167.48 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.167.48; helo=mail-lf1-f48.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cornell.edu; s=g.20171207; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=/x+MqkBJRwpN7wsQUh93E+Yam4e54fx3Ekx1QxAreTs=; b=CHSgxY5v9/jWC/K3mo6fwanYhFaN0AG+U7d9745TPdIs1BuEIgd7nCEQ8WbIq2A3be s6Cvqtc/KYDEjkI9rR2MNyf4m4+62zhPuBttzrzXBikMh8lr/8km2l3UwV7i6jnIx5qO iuSZcoW96+nO9HhI0Gvwr4oWv3h+YVSc37Pq0rH3hLJqBM0bz8bszVUcgbwtQ3RwPVMr Jp/0Q+RAqfiAPPG+PzvdRg3Jlq55OaLhM7RWfSZ8YXySu5BW3jsrrOwds/kxyQiBpXQX CTUGsHE3lbQqlN3m9GOcWFhmHxvDL76rDY32Cs7RFjh84y00Pjr+H1anvs9oML7Sq6+N 5F6w== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.167.48) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=cornell.edu; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cornell.edu; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a05:6512:3da9:: with SMTP id k41mr492870lfv.485.1628209601132; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 17:26:41 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [EE] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Well, Bob was thinking that maybe AC wouldn't be able to exert an opposing field for long enough to break contact but thinking some more about it, for most relays, even large-ish ones, a millisecond is long enough to make the contacts separate so I would think that if DC were enough to cause a problem then AC of the same magnitude would at least make the contacts chatter. On Thu, Aug 5, 2021, 4:50 PM Denny Esterline It also seems reasonable to assume that any current level the relay is > rated for will not lead to adverse behavior of the latching mechanism, > > -Denny > > On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 12:15 PM Sean Breheny wrote: > > > Correct - unless we're talking thousands of amps, I don't think it will > > influence the latching mechanism. > > > > On Thu, Aug 5, 2021, 11:51 AM Bob Blick > > > > I gather from the discussion that nobody thinks electromagnetism from= a > > > strong DC current through the relay will influence the relay's latchi= ng > > > response? > > > Thanks, Bob > > > > > > ________________________________________ > > > From: Bob Blick > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 4, 2021 3:32 PM > > > To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. > > > Subject: [EE] Latching relay ratings > > > > > > I'm helping a friend out with his camper's auxiliary 12 volt power, a= nd > > > I'd like to set up an automatic low battery disconnect. His solar > > > controller has a low battery voltage dry contact output but it's rate= d > > for > > > only 0.5A. I know I could just connect a 40 Amp automotive relay to > that, > > > but then there'd be a constant 120 milliamp drain until the battery > > > disconnected. So I am thinking of using a high current latching relay > and > > > some logic. But all the affordable latching relays, such as this 120 > Amp > > > Omron G9TB-K1ATW-E DC12 are rated for AC only. I'm assuming it's > because > > > high DC current could cause the relay to unlatch due to > electromagnetism, > > > and running 12VDC at 30 Amps through the 277VAC 120A contacts isn't > > really > > > going to be a problem. Or am I wrong? > > > > > > Bob > > > > > > -- > > > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > > > View/change your membership options at > > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > > > > > -- > > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > > View/change your membership options at > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > > > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .