Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 08:01:24 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 171EqJKt011872; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 10:53:01 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.15]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 171EqIMF011869 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 10:52:18 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE1.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.17]) by outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 171EqH2Q024265 for ; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 10:52:18 -0400 Received: from w92expo12.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.66) by oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 10:52:27 -0400 Received: from w92exhyb6.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.111) by w92expo12.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.66) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 10:51:44 -0400 Received: from NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.55.101) by w92exhyb6.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 10:52:17 -0400 Received: from MW4PR04CA0148.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:84::33) by CY1PR01MB2074.prod.exchangelabs.com (2a01:111:e400:c613::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4373.18; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 14:52:16 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM11FT017.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:84:cafe::f4) by MW4PR04CA0148.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:303:84::33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4373.20 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 14:52:16 +0000 Received: from mail-wm1-f41.google.com (209.85.128.41) by CO1NAM11FT017.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.175.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4373.18 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 14:52:15 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-f41.google.com with SMTP id i10-20020a05600c354ab029025a0f317abfso2433907wmq.3 for ; Sun, 01 Aug 2021 07:52:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from raspberry (cpc113460-oxfd27-2-0-cust322.4-3.cable.virginm.net. [86.24.157.67]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k186sm9150313wme.45.2021.08.01.07.52.14 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 01 Aug 2021 07:52:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan Pearce To: "piclist@mit.edu" Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2021 07:52:09 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE]: Solar Micro Inverters Thread-Topic: [EE]: Solar Micro Inverters Thread-Index: AdeG5hlY7Juou/D7SemKW6VKPUrIAg== Message-ID: <20210801155209.1f594104@raspberry> References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of googlemail.com designates 209.85.128.41 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.128.41; helo=mail-wm1-f41.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:organization :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3TvFdCiohuO3xFVWAF2+dyqFRMJxgB2sIkWgTz1HBCE=; b=cyJT+fbPopWs2V99JUg95wJnwl5D5i51vH18GZtBK6EseWeHJHkweKHAARfNNbRlk9 hDv7ny6EbgqtoMp6CLMmh3pb3R/Ml/GJEBTW2dTVISADPE6qZBDHI3MzkMglF5l8ZYMk kdgCZ61OS2jeUVj0gXZztJ9dTO+sQB7BetpoSBXIArxP5fDecD4pCfNYsdeB7IE/NWbI msJZwIGrfkK0GouoQHTtURKFNafY+xa77A2mnM9eN5pf492bwJMHHBAapu0jKN/3Hwzx hePnTa85lBzNsbE329XRJpU1NHJGfcN7h5RFCnCejwoG9SxK0S//LgHwRtlwz7E1tDno N+hg== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.128.41) smtp.mailfrom=googlemail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=googlemail.com;mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=googlemail.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a05:600c:1993:: with SMTP id t19mr12441072wmq.62.1627829534463; Sun, 01 Aug 2021 07:52:14 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [EE] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 15:19:32 +0100 Luis Moreira wrote: > Hi, > Sure I get that it will be doing something like that, but I wonder > how fast does it do it and how much all the devices attached to it > can take in terms of change. presumably the devices can take quite a > bit of change and I'm overthinking this, but would be interesting to > get some details. The descriptions I can find when I search on the > subject, talks of a PLL lock to the grid by using zero crossing > detection, which makes sense. Well, most 50Hz distribution systems talk in terms of 50Hz +/-5Hz, and I imagine 60Hz systems have a similar tolerance. So on the basis that the inverter can be pulled a similar amount I would expect phase lock to be achieved within a second or so. --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .