Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 05:15:23 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 16MC61Ne001574; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:06:42 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.15]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 16MC5xSr001545 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:05:59 -0400 Received: from w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.15]) by outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 16MC5piu005544 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:05:59 -0400 Received: from w92exhyb2.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.32) by w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:05:11 -0400 Received: from w92exhyb1.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.12) by w92exhyb2.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:05:42 -0400 Received: from NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.59.177) by w92exhyb1.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:05:42 -0400 Received: from MW4PR04CA0127.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:84::12) by DM6PR01MB3900.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:5:83::33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4352.24; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 12:05:42 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM11FT051.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:84:cafe::16) by MW4PR04CA0127.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:303:84::12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4352.24 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 12:05:41 +0000 Received: from mail-lf1-f45.google.com (209.85.167.45) by CO1NAM11FT051.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.174.114) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4352.24 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 12:05:41 +0000 Received: by mail-lf1-f45.google.com with SMTP id f30so8167922lfj.1 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 05:05:41 -0700 (PDT) From: RussellMc To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 05:05:02 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] EL lamps dimming Thread-Topic: [EE] EL lamps dimming Thread-Index: Add+8z/WFtxuxNxGQtq8rtlxcR0eJA== Message-ID: References: <5e3fa754-7198-9a41-3a9a-203698c65028@narwani.org> <3c7b9844-7477-059b-d62e-39d1bb681c21@narwani.org> List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.167.45 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.167.45; helo=mail-lf1-f45.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Z/da+qxBZecSf8htnrrab+WJzmWgxh0iquahMcJPhIA=; b=acHwpZqmeL/zas3Xa57qL72kncuA4MlJnQtobxoSH8q9FDI43SBldpLJBkBFem/LZY zGt2JJpNCJvRjpNY5hs0isvQ/w9zAea73Ob/Oj9oD28b0475vc9Qz0KCus9HVdXOGNwi 2nJ/XrNiT6OaPSgIirJKRNvhmH9pv1UKUdHJWIKOTv5b88d2BLHe2LyNaWlZHOPqaJYC a+RD5wvFY7ZIwIg10NsFv/uK1OaWAw7EgnxE3PTxWW97P393nly9IyaS8GxYf+V+dxaH SQUmj+NkdLpOBqvVEuGc8uJi5iaKT/9JXrJvF/J7olm9tvM1SrsSgskZz9vsoWQDkvBQ Rm+Q== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.167.45) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a05:6512:143:: with SMTP id m3mr29232856lfo.241.1626955539816; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 05:05:39 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [EE] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 at 23:50, Clint Jay wrote: > It is/was an issue, depends on the encapsulation of the EL material, I se= em > to remember reading that one or more companies had worked out a way to > encapsulate it in miniscule glass beads which reduced the problem. > > My experience with the flexible panels (Laptop backlights originally and > then on smaller LCD panels in embedded gear) showed that degradation > happens with use and age (much like a fluorescent tube) and any damage to > the plastic film encapsulating the panel would cause rapid degradation du= e > to moisture ingress, even if not damaged the thin wires that connected th= e > panel to power weren't perfectly sealed or had been damaged by soldering = so > panels would degrade from the entry point. > > I have a number of plastic encased EL panels about 8" x 3" from memory, probably over 20 years old. I could try operating one to see how it behaves. They used to dim with age - the ones I have were repair spares for a now long defunct product. Russell > On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 at 04:45, Neil wrote: > > > Hmmm... hadn't thought of things like moisture. > > Sadly, the only fix is a pricey replacement. > > > > > > > > On 7/17/2021 5:40 AM, Clint Jay wrote: > > > Hi Neil, they do age in use, I'm not sure if they age in storage but > > > moisture absorption used to be a problem. > > > > > > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021, 05:10 Bob Blick, wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Neil, > > >> I believe the brightness is more stable when controlled by current, > so a > > >> series resistor is probably better than a voltage divider. > > >> Friendly regards, Bob > > >> > > >> ________________________________________ > > >> From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu on behalf of > > Neil > > >> > > >> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2021 8:14 PM > > >> To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. > > >> Subject: [EE] EL lamps dimming > > >> > > >> Hi all, > > >> > > >> I'm helping someone build a flight sim from parts of an older > > >> FAA-certified simulator, and currently working on the EL panels. I > have > > >> 2 questions re: dimming: > > >> > > >> First, the older panels are much dimmer than the new panels. The > device > > >> is ~9 years old, but as we understand it, it was in storage for most > (if > > >> not all) of that time. Do EL lamps just go dim over time without us= e? > > >> If not, then maybe the device was used quite a bit, or maybe the > quality > > >> of the EL panels have just improved over time. > > >> > > >> Second, I need to dim the newer panels to match the older ones. Can= I > > >> do this with a simple voltage divider on the output of the EL > inverter? > > >> I have one inverter powering 7 small panels, so I'd have to dim the > > >> output side to the new panels, or maybe get a second inverter and di= m > > >> the input of one of the inverters. > > >> > > >> Cheers, > > >> -Neil. > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .