Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 14:15:08 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 16AL5Fr6019682; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 17:05:35 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-3.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.13]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 16AL5FNg019679 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 17:05:15 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE2.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.18]) by outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 16AL4g1x008571 for ; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 17:05:14 -0400 Received: from w92expo11.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.65) by oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.18; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 17:04:57 -0400 Received: from w92exhyb4.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.74) by w92expo11.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.65) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 17:04:58 -0400 Received: from NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.59.175) by w92exhyb4.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.74) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.18 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 17:04:58 -0400 Received: from MWHPR2001CA0004.namprd20.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:301:15::14) by BN8PR01MB5313.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:408:b9::30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4308.23; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 21:04:56 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM11FT003.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:301:15:cafe::43) by MWHPR2001CA0004.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:301:15::14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4308.20 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 21:04:55 +0000 Received: from mail-lf1-f47.google.com (209.85.167.47) by CO1NAM11FT003.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.175.93) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4308.20 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 21:04:55 +0000 Received: by mail-lf1-f47.google.com with SMTP id i5so1968432lfe.2 for ; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 14:04:55 -0700 (PDT) From: RussellMc To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2021 14:04:40 -0700 Subject: Re: [OT]:: Salt Water Concrete Thread-Topic: [OT]:: Salt Water Concrete Thread-Index: Add10KnpZg3R1YGsT9GlgGoo6a+6yg== Message-ID: References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.167.47 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.167.47; helo=mail-lf1-f47.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=u2O9fExActF+aW6d+gHu+1Je8Kv941dvfZ6ToAsj4Lc=; b=q5UYJG1Xq9YpSDTjjGbJMYEwom7iBRVM5EIQyN3VYgWhrKpgVe+ACxvjzECA7sStTL 0Lf5hR6XU1pkHhDryq3pYl17hxiY2Q2dnYmzbcN+foK+FXECT21JUPy23qs26K52msOt jFKCYKZlNd1T+q9Ao0kUCrDOVcXMxACQPaTYLwBnDWqvXJFT5iqXccQe30tIYVbC/8AB EyEFH/1rfDfAFml3gwx3SlgmXmmqSTnvkbJUz9vHmZHicHsAJVHd/FGt71Q8g2d9zk1Z UEBFxI5+gAIP7o3G6aBpRWPFrCAGE+g8sQi41uPwyBNXrJogX4e+AuckIg6/PSzMyUuy qxzA== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.167.47) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a05:6512:6ce:: with SMTP id u14mr27790808lff.241.1625951093665; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 14:04:53 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [OT] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 I've seen quite a few immensely spalled structures due to salt corrosion. Old wharves tend to die that way. Russell On Sun, 11 Jul 2021, 04:13 Sean Breheny, wrote: > This is eerily prescient given the recent tragic building collapse in > Miami, FL. > > On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 12:31 AM RussellMc wrote: > > > The 'trick' is to use basalt reinforcing to avoid steel corrosion issue= s. > > I'd not heard of basalt rebar before. > > Twice as strong as steel. > > > > > > > https://www.monolithic.org/blogs/presidents-sphere/salt-water-concrete-a-= reality?fbclid=3DIwAR2vtnDzySzzy2OHGm_fM09dgswB9YuuwMSOUOHE00I-peMRrWiLFvI7= jk8 > > > > > > > > Russell > > -- > > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > > View/change your membership options at > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > > > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .