Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 09:22:58 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 16AGBPbk028493; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 12:12:05 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-5.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.59]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 16AGBOK1028490 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 12:11:24 -0400 Received: from w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.15]) by outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 16AGBKtY020038 for ; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 12:11:23 -0400 Received: from w92expo14.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.68) by w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.18; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 12:11:07 -0400 Received: from w92exhyb6.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.111) by w92expo14.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.68) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 12:11:22 -0400 Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.58.104) by w92exhyb6.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.18 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 12:11:22 -0400 Received: from MWHPR02CA0003.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:4b::13) by BL0PR01MB4817.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:208:7c::31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4308.25; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 16:11:21 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM11FT004.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:4b:cafe::5f) by MWHPR02CA0003.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:300:4b::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4308.20 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 16:11:21 +0000 Received: from mail-lj1-f173.google.com (209.85.208.173) by CO1NAM11FT004.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.175.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4308.20 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 16:11:20 +0000 Received: by mail-lj1-f173.google.com with SMTP id r16so13869767ljk.9 for ; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 09:11:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Sean Breheny To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2021 09:11:07 -0700 Subject: Re: [OT]:: Salt Water Concrete Thread-Topic: [OT]:: Salt Water Concrete Thread-Index: Add1p9jvei7H1V0bQHSJsS05jyNYdQ== Message-ID: References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.208.173 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.208.173; helo=mail-lj1-f173.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cornell.edu; s=g.20171207; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=g80pfqxZ8qVtrJ2X+Vn4ZAC57nIpAksNhzbrzFBx20Y=; b=TgfBoZe8UJYiUGi1IaSrCr1+pqo1HHaEj5gpwSWX6Inrl3WZA2twqtRbssC5bmDodq qBoKmwpOWnrv74mDUJrbhrtCjPzbCji9xKF0VpoyqXU47Gn5uB43dpR25DyTwXc+6u6p ntuFXHF6vWlWx0xUebJtGPYzCO1zUzSSqW0KK8LDi48SMdTkcQ6yXODjm7wlCnsNQiCV FbYmRjg+HE1cwHbcCV25Pq/C2M4Jh/HAXUjlREIsYl94qqlfPfUC1DLoJaceORezgYo6 NMqMv7lAvo6qgZF/CLB9RqnV6bt6gnfinAonvfB4bS2y91AmgRqbk23LY/0lj+DKkdgb Aqbw== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.208.173) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=cornell.edu; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cornell.edu; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a2e:9d15:: with SMTP id t21mr34500963lji.200.1625933478923; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 09:11:18 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [OT] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 This is eerily prescient given the recent tragic building collapse in Miami, FL. On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 12:31 AM RussellMc wrote: > The 'trick' is to use basalt reinforcing to avoid steel corrosion issues. > I'd not heard of basalt rebar before. > Twice as strong as steel. > > > https://www.monolithic.org/blogs/presidents-sphere/salt-water-concrete-a-= reality?fbclid=3DIwAR2vtnDzySzzy2OHGm_fM09dgswB9YuuwMSOUOHE00I-peMRrWiLFvI7= jk8 > > > > Russell > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .