Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 10:11:54 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 15SH0xIW030509; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 13:01:45 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-5.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.59]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 15SH0wsB030505 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 13:00:58 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE1.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.17]) by outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 15SH0rok004263 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 13:00:58 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.112) by oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.18; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 13:00:47 -0400 Received: from w92exhyb2.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.32) by oc11exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.18; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 13:00:38 -0400 Received: from NAM12-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.55.168) by w92exhyb2.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.18 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 13:00:38 -0400 Received: from BN9PR03CA0340.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:f6::15) by BL0PR0102MB3329.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:207:30::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4219.22; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 17:00:37 +0000 Received: from BN8NAM11FT050.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:f6:cafe::42) by BN9PR03CA0340.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:408:f6::15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4264.18 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 17:00:37 +0000 Received: from NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (40.92.42.100) by BN8NAM11FT050.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.177.5) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4264.18 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 17:00:36 +0000 Received: from BN7NAM10FT043.eop-nam10.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e8f::43) by BN7NAM10HT134.eop-nam10.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e8f::227) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4264.18; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 17:00:35 +0000 Received: from SJ0PR02MB7662.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e8f::41) by BN7NAM10FT043.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e8f::110) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4264.18 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 17:00:35 +0000 Received: from SJ0PR02MB7662.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::fdba:4e87:4976:a3db]) by SJ0PR02MB7662.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::fdba:4e87:4976:a3db%7]) with mapi id 15.20.4264.026; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 17:00:35 +0000 From: Bob Blick To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 10:00:35 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] HVAC filter efficiency and energy consumption Thread-Topic: [EE] HVAC filter efficiency and energy consumption Thread-Index: AQHXbDfHm2McbLI9BkK555ECwU7dDKspoGTM Message-ID: References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of outlook.com designates 40.92.42.100 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=40.92.42.100; helo=NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ct1SdtRObuHNLbf38R36O2qAxNzDLXtnyJmacgCCjE0=; b=iD6pSfn6K9+Usr46eRDOAko5JQf4Vkg7IB9/RIWV+8GDF57KDYg5M3NaQvOX+rGNBXfHd21nppDec/CtOA8XV8x+0awK5MYd3mwuoiNAmQB2iTwQXydvxwEU7hhz6r2tim1EswfdiwFZTBfsSMvp6u4+kl4nbaHGnhav2w0tW9kUrebrgQUr5u7rBTH5WycNZ8RJImM0MoE+C4R7GX6QXXJGrCaQIlksUK/iV3aLC8YDO+6pjHtURmiJH9cN27kjqqfucLFPVJnOC2xBYYvRoQ9TwzstiFsXyUGhCubic1xOLYdJXwQ0Grfa21mgo20riYFJw9IliiRh89doYZukWg== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 40.92.42.100) smtp.mailfrom=outlook.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=outlook.com; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=outlook.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-topics: [EE] x-mime-autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by PCH.mit.edu id 15SH0wsB030505 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi Mark, Welcome to the piclist! With my aging forced-air furnace, one of the things that always worries me = is the temperature of the heated air and the number of lighting cycles it g= oes through. I figure the lower and fewer, the better. So I tend to notice = when the furnace is running and the burner shuts off and then relights a mo= ment later due to the exit temperature switch operating. One would think th= at less airflow restriction would lead to cooler air and less cycling of th= e burner. Changing out a dirty filter for a clean one should reduce restric= tion, but I have not noticed it making any difference. That leads me to bel= ieve the filter is not dominating airflow restrictions in the system. My ho= use is a typical one made with cheap materials to the minimum building code= in 1980 or so, just like all the other houses in my neighborhood. The filt= ers I use are the middle-grade ones(red package) and seem to be the most po= pular ones available locally. Cheerful regards, Bob ________________________________________ From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu on behalf of Mark H= owles=20 Sent: Monday, June 28, 2021 7:51 AM To: piclist@mit.edu Subject: [EE] HVAC filter efficiency and energy consumption Hello, I was contemplating changing my Air filters to MERV11 and was told by some people that they are bad for energy usage and air flow. I came across a study that measured and compared the effects of low efficiency and high efficiency filters and I found the technical details fascinating. Their conclusion was that effects are not significant in residential settings. Does anyone have experience with this, or have monitored this before on their own? I thought of just correlating energy consumption increase/decrease around the initial few days of installing the filter, at similar temperatures, though the paper suggests there can be a complex interaction of many variables before coming to conclusions. Here is a link to the Study: https://www.caee.utexas.edu/prof/novoselac/Publications/Novoselac_ASHRAE_Tr= ansactions_2010.pdf --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .