Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 12:15:07 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 158J6irv000624; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 15:06:58 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-5.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.59]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 158J6hKs000621 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 15:06:43 -0400 Received: from w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.15]) by outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 158J6euf028669 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 15:06:42 -0400 Received: from oc11expo32.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.113) by w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.18; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 15:06:14 -0400 Received: from w92exhyb3.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.73) by oc11expo32.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 15:06:13 -0400 Received: from NAM11-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.57.169) by w92exhyb3.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.18 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 15:06:13 -0400 Received: from BN1PR13CA0015.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:e2::20) by BL0PR01MB5201.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:208:65::19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4195.20; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 19:06:12 +0000 Received: from BN8NAM11FT019.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:e2:cafe::30) by BN1PR13CA0015.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:408:e2::20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4219.10 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 19:06:12 +0000 Received: from mulvey.us (24.169.71.174) by BN8NAM11FT019.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.176.158) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.4195.22 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 19:06:12 +0000 Received: from [192.168.100.55] ([192.168.100.55]) by mulvey.us with MailEnable ESMTPSA (version=TLS1_2 cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA_P256); Tue, 8 Jun 2021 15:06:10 -0400 From: Allen Mulvey To: "piclist@mit.edu" Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 12:06:10 -0700 Subject: Re: [OT]Re: testing - is anybody there? Thread-Topic: [OT]Re: testing - is anybody there? Thread-Index: AddcmpgsVOlSl6h3TcmWG8JAP0RoVQ== Message-ID: <605c0f75-e70a-f4e8-37f0-48bfbd3d4244@amulvey.com> References: <20210606232246.6237a8d2@raspberry> <05344641-901b-5f06-1707-717198da8ccb@amulvey.com> <85f323a-1b90-ed22-3ba0-fe217c2327ce@allotrope.net> <642ac647-e616-163a-fc4d-3f5c8c4c9368@amulvey.com> List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of amulvey.com designates 24.169.71.174 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=24.169.71.174; helo=mulvey.us; dkim-signature: v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; h=to:references:from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; d=amulvey.com; s=amulvey; a=rsa-sha256; bh=7iqazcVUxReq12BcHQRWZbMK9LcyW09L7fsZTppoq1E=; b=Bk/kNWhHca0AtZ5FmiopqI26OHZXJj42tqZAe/IOowd5SDBzLcUXwCbrH/zmwgA3a cbyrZD4Xcmbd0SndimeRMdO4anqSszHCbqAPguS5UVV4SjrYNI+2TO3WcbIAFcvCAA+ pLvz97/QbAEBdjHGZHJMPrUC41lkcpPE8ib1phs=; authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 24.169.71.174) smtp.mailfrom=amulvey.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=amulvey.com;mit.edu; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=amulvey.com; user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-topics: [OT] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 x-me-bayesian: 0.000000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Sergio, I have an Ubiquity router which has several external ports. One port can=20 be set as a DMZ with everything passing directly through with no=20 filtering or visible forwarding. That could allow you to connect another=20 router and a whole separate network. So far, I have had no need for it=20 although I came close when I had one port for dedicated telephone service. I put the web and email on the same VM because originally I only wanted=20 one VM exposed to the outside world. I now have another VM for telemetry=20 (MQTT) and may eventually add a remote desktop controller. Allen On 6/8/2021 3:18 PM, smplx wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Jun 2021, Allen Mulvey wrote: > >> Sergio, >> >> My VM hosts my mail server and my web server. My gateway router uses >> port forwarding on the necessary well-known ports. There is no proxy. >> For mail administration, as a system administrator, I can log into the >> VM and access everything in one place. This is necessary for most global >> settings. However routine administration is done by a designated >> administrator for each post office. He then uses a web app to access >> only his own post office. A post office may have more than one domain >> although most have only one. Clients may use webmail or any standard POP >> or IMAP client app. I'm not sure if I answered your question. >> >> Allen >> > Hi Allen, > > Yes thank you. > > I tried using port forwarding from my old gateway to my new gateway (whil= e > I was building the new gateway) but could not get it to work (it kept > changing the senders source address to be the old gateway). I finally got > around this by adding a dedicated interface directly to the router (which > is also doing port forwarding but it works from there?!). > > The only other service I have running on the mail server VM is the > IMAP/POP server so that others can send and receive email directly from > their machines using the mail server as a relay. > > I keep other services such as web and DB in their dedicated VMs. > > Regards > Sergio --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .