Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Wed, 26 May 2021 21:53:14 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 14R4hv2Q010069; Thu, 27 May 2021 00:44:07 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-5.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.59]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 14R4hutx010065 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 00:43:56 -0400 Received: from w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.15]) by outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 14R4hqo7023253 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 00:43:56 -0400 Received: from w92expo23.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.77) by w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.18; Thu, 27 May 2021 00:43:36 -0400 Received: from w92exhyb8.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.113) by w92expo23.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.77) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 27 May 2021 00:43:39 -0400 Received: from NAM12-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.55.169) by w92exhyb8.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.18 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 27 May 2021 00:43:39 -0400 Received: from MWHPR02CA0023.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:4b::33) by BN3PR01MB2097.prod.exchangelabs.com (2a01:111:e400:7bb4::9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4150.26; Thu, 27 May 2021 04:43:37 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM11FT022.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:4b:cafe::e2) by MWHPR02CA0023.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:300:4b::33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4173.20 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 27 May 2021 04:43:37 +0000 Received: from mail-ed1-f46.google.com (209.85.208.46) by CO1NAM11FT022.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.175.199) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4129.25 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 27 May 2021 04:43:37 +0000 Received: by mail-ed1-f46.google.com with SMTP id o5so4152320edc.5 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 21:43:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Ryan O'Connor To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 21:43:17 -0700 Subject: Re: [OT]:: Salt Water Concrete Thread-Topic: [OT]:: Salt Water Concrete Thread-Index: AddStDQ2Iy/I4wgKS/iFAdwsXCSVdQ== Message-ID: References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.208.46 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.208.46; helo=mail-ed1-f46.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=NpadUchPFpQNT3bIvCKruznLewHAMUC8KlbylOsHQvo=; b=Kr6dTRU7AJIZB+B12pVZo2+aDjCDsx/vJP78jhEVH2I7t3q2v4CKTKSlwPy/O73W6x J89vgokDo/6e3sMc0El7OEJlTpz7AivTE3gKRs9F10ArV6G35bC7kOeqkcs7tmwwIX6p d/we/BtZaulbueuN7Z9NBVQ09GA9UrH4ZNdP6CcCP0cXsJ1mxkT/4Oe0JTfKvk6N7oSR L2uRKuonAwLpsi1+iG3h/XoNeo8+3kWj75rqnCx/Ygc8Oyn/R9phd3ssO7tV0ukio5zi 29K5Q4FmW9x1Sp14+fvejhOh3SurbOxn77ZKrgF+M95OF48xrg39K9fNK16/7cBH1G6S d9pw== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.208.46) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:aa7:d2ce:: with SMTP id k14mr1353005edr.318.1622090615521; Wed, 26 May 2021 21:43:35 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [OT] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Neither. That could be a game changer for tunnels and bridges though? Things are hell expensive to maintain because of the rusting steel long-term. On Thu, 27 May 2021 at 16:31, RussellMc wrote: > The 'trick' is to use basalt reinforcing to avoid steel corrosion issues. > I'd not heard of basalt rebar before. > Twice as strong as steel. > > > https://www.monolithic.org/blogs/presidents-sphere/salt-water-concrete-a-= reality?fbclid=3DIwAR2vtnDzySzzy2OHGm_fM09dgswB9YuuwMSOUOHE00I-peMRrWiLFvI7= jk8 > > > > Russell > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .