Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 05:21:50 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 12ECCmnU032335; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 08:13:37 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-5.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.59]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 12ECCkJd032307 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 08:12:46 -0400 Received: from w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.15]) by outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 12ECCkK3001187 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 08:12:46 -0400 Received: from oc11expo21.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.52) by w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 08:12:38 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.60) by oc11expo21.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.52) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 08:12:46 -0400 Received: from NAM11-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.57.173) by oc11exhyb1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 08:12:45 -0400 Received: from BN1PR10CA0017.namprd10.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:e0::22) by CH2PR01MB5957.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:610:49::22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3933.32; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 12:12:43 +0000 Received: from BN8NAM11FT047.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:e0:cafe::50) by BN1PR10CA0017.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:408:e0::22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3933.32 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 12:12:43 +0000 Received: from mail-ej1-f51.google.com (209.85.218.51) by BN8NAM11FT047.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.177.220) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3933.31 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 12:12:42 +0000 Received: by mail-ej1-f51.google.com with SMTP id bm21so61656172ejb.4 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 05:12:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from raspberry (cpc113460-oxfd27-2-0-cust322.4-3.cable.virginm.net. [86.24.157.67]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m10sm5461083ejx.10.2021.03.14.05.12.41 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 14 Mar 2021 05:12:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan Pearce To: "piclist@mit.edu" Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 05:12:37 -0700 Subject: Re: [PIC] 1 Controller and 18 Peripheral PICs Thread-Topic: [PIC] 1 Controller and 18 Peripheral PICs Thread-Index: AdcYzJzOMxUBaZlIRL+7dGZWoh0Vxg== Message-ID: <20210314121237.4cd74390@raspberry> References: <24a1eea7-dbb8-da98-309e-cd4fb87bd4d4@gmail.com> <6d88a2e449f9c633a0ca57efdc178c97.squirrel@mai.hallikainen.org> List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of googlemail.com designates 209.85.218.51 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.218.51; helo=mail-ej1-f51.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:organization :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ma0YEcFBqrkKumHtz5Drieaq0B7s9d8ajH51kTZ0xy4=; b=rSHr2TyxSvC1FXxcavaj6/JsUjBcPhRQSbXnfRFwVYrpVbRltsdT1RV18t2Uv4tN1e D/wl3O/o5BzgwVWKxaE/8V0t7rLG1nt8zHJr/L8B+3b/9PMfmnzLDDPSc09BfdOe9q9L pW7jXaqoPcXKinANSPWa/kLgD3kYHpnBpgJ9n3lz01NtIe0RQX+mBBqmEZ0I86qMr7KR j2S8TneuGURM/G5isdbfGoAbNTGvTAxN1kO7cxB75edbvWudxrIFgSEhZqWNdSKKI/nr nMbbmhCr6KEYUxXChszVHPBV3XrKNmWUrVQoY60/339Th4KxfezX034YjtOKApW9abWd yhQQ== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.218.51) smtp.mailfrom=googlemail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=googlemail.com;mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=googlemail.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a17:906:f953:: with SMTP id ld19mr17773933ejb.164.1615723962092; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 05:12:42 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [PIC] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 22:00:30 -0800 AK <00@case.edu> wrote: > Have you considered a series of WS2801 or WS2811 serial controlled > ICs, their PWM output connected to a simple amp to handle your higher > current LEDs? > These controllers are widely used, have built-in PWM control of 3 > LEDs each package, and can be strung in a serial series. You can > effectively control a large array of LEDs with a single > microcontroller pin tied to the SPI peripheral output. >=20 There is also a version that contains a fourth white LED to get better white colours. Also there is a Microchip app note on driving these using a CLC peripheral to generate the clock shaping needed for the data transfer without taking up processing time on the PIC. On the Microchip Forum someone has partly posted a project using a dual core dsPIC33CH chip to drive these at continuous maximum clock speed with enough processing power in the PIC to do moving images on a matrix display. --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .