Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 17:22:41 -0800 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 1191D0k7019014; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 20:13:36 -0500 Received: from outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-5.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.59]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 1191CxY0019011 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 20:12:59 -0500 Received: from oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE2.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.18]) by outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 1191Bw23019511 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 20:12:59 -0500 Received: from oc11expo17.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.48) by oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 20:12:08 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb8.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.113) by oc11expo17.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.48) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 20:12:31 -0500 Received: from NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.55.105) by oc11exhyb8.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 20:12:31 -0500 Received: from BN9PR03CA0838.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:13e::33) by BL0PR01MB4706.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:208:77::12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3825.30; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 01:12:30 +0000 Received: from BN8NAM11FT039.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:13e:cafe::85) by BN9PR03CA0838.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:408:13e::33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3825.21 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 01:12:30 +0000 Received: from mail-ed1-f51.google.com (209.85.208.51) by BN8NAM11FT039.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.177.169) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3784.12 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 01:12:30 +0000 Received: by mail-ed1-f51.google.com with SMTP id s26so15739485edt.10 for ; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 17:12:30 -0800 (PST) From: Ryan O'Connor To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 17:12:17 -0800 Subject: Re: [EE] Low noise attenuator Thread-Topic: [EE] Low noise attenuator Thread-Index: Adb+gg/cqU1KanhwQNKZU+ywUyi1AQ== Message-ID: References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.208.51 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.208.51; helo=mail-ed1-f51.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ez++USYF/rajoUfkEakY+pGTpDnaXqjJ+i2PwUYmU+Y=; b=f1OZZ8HPFQvQ4TTyO6mR6MNrWfo0RbCtAAK1B7uMCN+JSunsvO9G4IRqSlCgdj/fmb DHg3McMuPegyJoGWEzwP1DYbHOA/EF2cOE45jMTihKpADEm0J1yvDO2gOeQAm9GhDTz9 dpZjz+Jnes8mO8GHKWQ7DhbNtVrfivNMn3j+wtStDtmGKLAiltt1bOcJjHTWtue6GJ2e GcUYKL6UyLUObqUJDR4hPFsR0rRDbfJCKEIEINL6PulElPV5Jp3vU6LXXLvHVg/6ZAkr 02L03lCjQOOdT9TxfVRma4ejMAZN0bvEMX0T09tseehZPqHy8FKrIE9sMHQXtZG+cFtC BdsA== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.208.51) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a50:e40d:: with SMTP id d13mr19688771edm.286.1612833149026; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 17:12:29 -0800 (PST) x-topics: [EE] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 David do you have any theory or practice which can explain this? I would be interested to read more about why this helps. I'm trying to read up on Sean's topics and I'm finding it pretty complex. I have more questions than before, such as what is the relationship between impedence matching to reduce noise and impedence matching to gain maximum power? Do they happen to co-inside, or how much out of phase are they (literally can't find anything on the net about this) Cheers Ryan On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 13:57, David VanHorn wrote: > Use capacitive dividers. > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021, 4:20 PM Sean Breheny wrote: > > > A fundamental property of absorbative attenuators (i.e. those which > > dissipate the power removed from the signal) is that they introduce > > (1-a)kTB thermal noise in watts, where a is the attenuation factor, k i= s > > Boltzman's constant, T is kelvin temperature of the attenuator, and B i= s > > the downstream circuit bandwidth in Hz. So, for example, a 10dB > attenuator > > (a=3D0.1), introduces 90% of a full equivalent of thermal noise. > > > > It is possible to attenuate reflectively (i.e., produce an impedance > > mismatch) and that can often circumvent this limitation although it > depends > > on the source characteristics. There is a common practice in low noise > > amplifiers call "noise matching" where instead of matching the impedanc= e > of > > the source to that of the amplifier input, a purposeful mismatch is > > introduced which reduces the contribution of noise due to the real part > of > > the amplifier's input impedance. I think the fundamental principle is t= he > > same. > > > > Sean > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 5:00 PM Ryan O'Connor wrote= : > > > > > Hi, I am curious about a general topic which mostly interests me in t= he > > > area of sensitive audio signals. > > > > > > What options do I have for attenuating a copper line signal while > > > introducing a very low amount of noise? For example, if I grounded L+= R > > > channels using independent resistors would that work? OR do I need a > > proper > > > high-pass or low-pass filter design? But then what about > > > capacitors/inductors or series resistors introducing thermal noise? > > > > > > Open to discussion on types of noise as well :) > > > > > > Ryan > > > -- > > > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > > > View/change your membership options at > > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > > > > > -- > > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > > View/change your membership options at > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > > > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .