Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:44:11 -0800 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 10QIYKVd032313; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:34:55 -0500 Received: from outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.15]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 10QIYIUx032299 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:34:18 -0500 Received: from w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.15]) by outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 10QIYCuT008568 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:34:17 -0500 Received: from oc11expo10.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.15) by w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:33:39 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.98) by oc11expo10.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:34:02 -0500 Received: from NAM11-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.58.172) by oc11exhyb2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:34:02 -0500 Received: from MW2PR2101CA0031.namprd21.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:302:1::44) by CY4PR01MB2373.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:903:72::15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3784.15; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 18:34:01 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM11FT043.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:302:1:cafe::14) by MW2PR2101CA0031.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:302:1::44) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3825.1 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 18:34:01 +0000 Received: from NAM11-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (40.92.18.64) by CO1NAM11FT043.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.174.193) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3784.12 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 18:34:01 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM11FT050.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:3861::4c) by CO1NAM11HT166.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:3861::338) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3784.12; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 18:34:00 +0000 Received: from BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:3861::52) by CO1NAM11FT050.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:3861::79) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3784.12 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 18:34:00 +0000 Received: from BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9b3:65a5:8cdc:2f77]) by BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9b3:65a5:8cdc:2f77%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3784.017; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 18:34:00 +0000 From: Bob Blick To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:34:00 -0800 Subject: Re: [EE] Connecting european device to US main. Thread-Topic: [EE] Connecting european device to US main. Thread-Index: AQHW8/RmXZqKiodJ90+0CG2FBE+dHqo6D9aAgAAiNYCAAAZVmg== Message-ID: References: <7cc8c501-9e58-1d50-de8d-0e6ca40243cd@p10link.net>, List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of outlook.com designates 40.92.18.64 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=40.92.18.64; helo=NAM11-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=V0NeR/WjWlB5vV4CagkdmDd/JR3VBZp8giAGwGPjOF8=; b=gE1GBSXTvzIu3KFfv9XbLh/8Q33F4yPsYxL68FDeAEptT0eHFsc/vbILc5vvOADPjfAOi6+Vq6N5bInBV+6k9fso6lWgMy4QiCoRc3dKaycrstspTHZkxWS2VJbXYKkfTuZl6KxMqCgZUrMqTrGGvdN1tDRiuihnDl4soUmN81WIRbspMygnlMvJePXlAzgVL5BMHLo/Jo+EPqBgf57Ye70I4rPSoomnHZ4+mY1rlfDluRN/nhHovwssRK4X6NmdO8Gkct52NAwb0RphG8WVpD6eSFi7zgeWB2PT85OwRkYieyvvV5XTEx59t+Iyuj4zlzAr/0X68IpHDu0OAcqvpg== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 40.92.18.64) smtp.mailfrom=outlook.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=outlook.com; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=outlook.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-topics: [EE] x-mime-autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by PCH.mit.edu id 10QIYIUx032299 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi Harold, If you look at a residential North American breaker panel, you'll see lots = of single circuit breakers for 120V circuits, and some wide 240V breakers t= hat grab both busbars. The 240V breakers disconnect both phases even if onl= y one phase causes the trip. It's a code requirement. Drawing a 240V load from two opposite-phased 120V breakers is not allowed b= ecause of the safety concerns, even if it does work. On the other hand, running two 120V branches from a 240V breaker seems safe= .. I don't know if it's allowed by code, probably not, it could make diagnos= ing trips more difficult. Friendly regards, Bob ________________________________________ From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu on behalf of Harold= Hallikainen=20 Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 9:59 AM To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Subject: Re: [EE] Connecting european device to US main. I agree that phase to phase will give 240 V (unless you're on a 3 phase wye, in which case it will be 208 V). Most electronic devices now have "universal" power supplies that work from something like 100 V to 260 V. One thought on doing a phase to phase connection is the loss of overcurrent protection. I think pretty much everything only fuses the hot side of the power line. That guarantees no high voltage in a device that blows a fuse (blowing a fuse in the neutral would remove an overcurrent load but leave line voltage in the device). But, if operating phase to phase, what about a "neutral" to ground short? There would be no overcurrent protection at the device (just the branch circuit protection). I have thought of powering audio equipment that has a universal power supply from 240 V phase to phase to provide it with "balanced power" that results in a cancellation of ground leakage current due to the EMI filter Y capacitors. But, I am concerned about a lack of protection on one side of the line. Harold --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .