Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 15:39:20 -0800 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 10INUW05008093; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 18:31:08 -0500 Received: from outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-3.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.13]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 10INLBlC007104 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 18:21:11 -0500 Received: from oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE1.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.17]) by outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 10INLARu008186 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 18:21:11 -0500 Received: from w92expo7.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.61) by oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 18:21:02 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.98) by w92expo7.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 18:21:10 -0500 Received: from NAM11-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.56.168) by oc11exhyb2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 18:21:10 -0500 Received: from MW4PR04CA0293.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:89::28) by CY4PR01MB2437.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:903:72::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3763.11; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 23:21:08 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM11FT017.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:89:cafe::7f) by MW4PR04CA0293.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:303:89::28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3763.9 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 23:21:08 +0000 Received: from mail-lj1-f176.google.com (209.85.208.176) by CO1NAM11FT017.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.175.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3763.12 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 23:21:08 +0000 Received: by mail-lj1-f176.google.com with SMTP id m13so19878213ljo.11 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 15:21:08 -0800 (PST) From: Sean Breheny To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 15:20:55 -0800 Subject: Re: [EE] Lossy bandwidth compression with analog circutry? Thread-Topic: [EE] Lossy bandwidth compression with analog circutry? Thread-Index: Adbt8yURmZu6CWr0T5SoJTc3tlaBkQ== Message-ID: References: <20210117000941.3f40efcc@raspberry> List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.208.176 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.208.176; helo=mail-lj1-f176.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cornell.edu; s=g.20171207; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=cZe9DxrGSsU7Ph6GmKDb3Y4eTMdiAJZqpCNUmy6XWm0=; b=H5IZg/YRm/girlJD3h6H+PeR7WbTuEADbNfnPT7+lOe52HOrXVIYVzN+N5gEGEAdkh GS2jIJZ7UQq5RAYnxFN8w7A4G3Ywl6aOXU1gniimteYg2CbcqPvbwIkwcRok5v8L0F7A oqOn10VEYdytnq664+WnEYa3mtWcjI2kbQ8X6kRUyobRoR9FqkGxdKGx1MkSmOIRgmWP cwL6UyoCbGGlqHekriNAqWDvolg5mOxnkmZoJ1wnF3qYsEaaNtJqwvp828WZC+Fy4VRN VD27AgKmmDr9vEy8nbVm1tn0MCQgGGbw9NlQy0kpuF4/tQbxoBROOi0ajnqKE4dTDbFz YuzA== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.208.176) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=cornell.edu; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cornell.edu; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a2e:b0c3:: with SMTP id g3mr720441ljl.57.1611012066659; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 15:21:06 -0800 (PST) x-topics: [EE] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Don't forget that if you can accept lossy signal processing, you can use aliasing to your advantage. For example, if you undersample but can control the precise sampling frequency then you can make small changes in the sampling frequency and shift aliased signals around to get a good picture of what the spectrum looks like without having to actually sample at 2x the highest frequency. If, however, you need an actual accurate instantaneous snapshot of the entire 100MHz of spectrum then there is no way to do that without sampling at least at 200 Msps. Sean On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 7:46 PM Jason White wrote: > > That's right, as you mentioned a fast ADC and processor is needed to cove= r > large bandwidths. I was curious if there were other methods. > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .