Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 12:20:05 -0800 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 0BBK9fFr029315; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:11:05 -0500 Received: from outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.15]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 0BBK9eex029312 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:09:40 -0500 Received: from w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.15]) by outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 0BBK9bIS008937 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:09:40 -0500 Received: from w92expo15.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.69) by w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:09:22 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.60) by w92expo15.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.69) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:09:26 -0500 Received: from NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.59.173) by oc11exhyb1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:09:25 -0500 Received: from MW4PR03CA0153.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:8d::8) by DM5PR0101MB2874.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:4:2c::28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3632.19; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 20:09:24 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM11FT066.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:8d:cafe::e1) by MW4PR03CA0153.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:303:8d::8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3654.12 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 20:09:24 +0000 Received: from premium47-1.web-hosting.com (68.65.123.241) by CO1NAM11FT066.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.175.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3632.17 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 20:09:24 +0000 Received: from 107-145-246-199.res.spectrum.com ([107.145.246.199]:50536 helo=[192.168.0.108]) by premium47.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1knoj5-004Fs1-2O; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:09:23 -0500 From: Neil To: "piclist@mit.edu" Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 12:09:13 -0800 Subject: Re: [EE] Eliminating external noise through PS Thread-Topic: [EE] Eliminating external noise through PS Thread-Index: AdbP+wPrkfUoP4MPTwGUT2H4cysLIw== Message-ID: <5FD3D1E9.8040605@narwani.org> References: <5FCFC00E.8040703@narwani.org> <004f01d6cf54$9da13a80$d8e3af80$@functech.com> List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: <004f01d6cf54$9da13a80$d8e3af80$@functech.com> Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: narwani.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=narwani.org ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:From:To:References:Subject:Sender:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=tWFm4Ljry499rjtKODtLEvIlHGBKMf7nXBWJcIpTBsM=; b=fIwjmkD1JcJ7a1o33y557/qj/+ P4AkSD7S+n5LJAceMR3l1jkCImz5M7mNgFrcooRJCricbFOYbOgAoXiMtnosPgnw4D9zbyYOlki6I ymFHZRxoiC1aqsNPcsHeqnUwan+aisx7PUnrXuSvBM/3ixkcOsMfUACi43OkeXZx4f5kXpKjNhaur wm+hz7v2addm0uKyoWAZ2ODShZMpDkihWE9VkESszJ0k5lEeJynb+VieNK4Zqk0Xyq+qi4aSzIkdA oO7mRgiLI3krXgzNzbUhi6Hur0x9pg7tYn0kBW6n5Neo1oZG5gyDx/0vFJ/QhGj/IOzxRVTWZawaz R/9Y9Wmw==; authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is 68.65.123.241) smtp.mailfrom=narwani.org; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=narwani.org;mit.edu; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=narwani.org; user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-source-args: x-source-dir: x-antiabuse: Sender Address Domain - narwani.org x-source: x-authenticated-sender: premium47.web-hosting.com: ca4@narwani.org x-topics: [EE] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Sorry, disappeared for a couple days, but some quick answers to=20 everything for now, and my next steps: - Yes I have flyback diodes. Highlighted with yellow here, just above=20 the relays...=20 http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-06.jpg - James & Russell, in that diagram also, I labeled the paths for power. =20 The 5V to the relays is pretty much dedicated and 5V is on the top=20 layer, and (dedicated) ground for the relays on the bottom layer. But=20 yes, it's right up against the AC section, but as many components have=20 been removed now, I will push that far away. - The 3.3V regulator has been getting a bit warmer than I like, so I=20 have been planning to use a buck converter instead. But maybe I should=20 run two 3.3V regulators instead? I would think that the buck converter=20 would be pass less of the noise through. - I ran over there quickly to pick up stuff and tried a crude=20 (uncalculated) common-mode choke I made up from stuff I could find. Did=20 not make in dent in the noise coming through. See here...=20 http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-07.jpg - I feel like Brent may be correct, that the noise may be coming from=20 the relay side. The processor (ESP32) is resetting. I know it's not a=20 firmware issue as it had zero crashes with the previous pump. Adding some info: The previous pump was a huge AC pump. This new pump is actually DC, but=20 there's a bridge rectifier on the wires. So I'm now convinced that the=20 noise is coming from brushes. I brought the pump with me, and I have a new blank board. My plan is to=20 reproduce just enough of the circuit to see the noise, and I can cut and=20 re-route traces (the 5V & ground to the relays) to see if helps. I will also add a ceramic capacitor to the pump wires (right at the=20 pump), and hope that helps. Plus twist the wires. I'll be back with some results. Cheers, -Neil. On 12/10/2020 7:28 PM, FTL wrote: > This is almost too obvious, but in the schematic I do not see a flyback > diode across the relay to suppress the back EMF when the relay is turned > off. The lack of diode would cause a serious spike in the 5V supply when = the > relay is turned off. > > Is the transistor being turned on hard enough to keep the relay on proper= ly. > If it is not fully on with no flyback diode, maybe it is occasionally > releasing and causing big noise on the 5V bus. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu On Behalf Of Nei= l >> Sent: December 8, 2020 11:04 AM >> To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. >> Subject: [EE] Eliminating external noise through PS >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm working on a device that takes 120VAC, converts to 5VDC with a PCB- >> mounted power supply, then further reduces that to 3.3VDC with a linear >> regulator. >> A 3.3V microcontroller switches a relay to power a 120VAC pump. >> Overview... >> http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-00.jpg >> >> All has been great until we switched to a specific pump, which happens t= o >> generate a LOT of conducted noise, which passes through the 5V PS, and t= he >> 3.3V regulator, and causing the microcontroller to crash. >> I did a bunch of tested and found that the noise is being conducted > through >> the wires back to the board through the PS, through the linear regulator= , > and >> this is the 3.3V line... >> http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-01.jpg >> >> I was over at someone else's place so did not have a lot of parts with m= e, >> but... >> Adding a bunch more 0.1uf bypass capacitors all over the board did not > help. >> Changing the power supply from an IRM-10-5 (industrial spec, 200mV >> ripple) to MPM-10-5 (medical spec, 100mV ripple), helped reduce the rate > of >> the crashing... but the ripple itself wasn't causing crashing. >> >> Adding (non-specific size) ferrites to the pump wires, and 120VAC input > wires >> did not help. >> I then tried to create a crude/uncalculated LC filter (which whatever >> components I had on hand (33uh inductor and 1000uf capacitor, should be >> low ESR), then a Pi filter (added 680 uF capacitor), and those barely ma= de > a >> dent. >> Eventually I added another 0.1uf capacitor to the output side of the pi > filter >> and that helped enough to prevent the microcontroller crashing. >> But there is still a lot of noise on the 3.3V line... >> http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-02.jpg >> http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-03.jpg >> >> FWIW, this is where it ended up... >> http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-04.jpg >> >> The noise is in the 7Mhz to 30Mhz range (prob even higher). >> I feel like smaller, low-ESR ceramic caps should help, but I doubt it wi= ll > take >> out most of the noise. >> What is the right type of filter to eliminate this noise? >> >> Cheers, >> -Neil. >> >> -- >> http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive >> View/change your membership options at >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .