Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 01:48:19 -0800 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 0B99aQFo013475; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 04:39:29 -0500 Received: from outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-3.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.13]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 0B99aOrC013472 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 04:36:25 -0500 Received: from oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE2.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.18]) by outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 0B99aODU013386 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 04:36:24 -0500 Received: from oc11expo19.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.50) by oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 04:35:58 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb5.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.110) by oc11expo19.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 04:36:24 -0500 Received: from NAM11-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.56.173) by oc11exhyb5.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.110) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 04:36:23 -0500 Received: from BN6PR16CA0035.namprd16.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:405:14::21) by SN6PR01MB4559.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:805:e8::28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3654.12; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 09:36:22 +0000 Received: from BN8NAM11FT048.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:405:14:cafe::99) by BN6PR16CA0035.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:405:14::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3654.12 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 09:36:22 +0000 Received: from mail-ej1-f51.google.com (209.85.218.51) by BN8NAM11FT048.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.177.117) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3632.17 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 09:36:22 +0000 Received: by mail-ej1-f51.google.com with SMTP id b9so1167837ejy.0 for ; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 01:36:21 -0800 (PST) From: Ryan O'Connor To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 01:36:08 -0800 Subject: Re: [EE] Eliminating external noise through PS Thread-Topic: [EE] Eliminating external noise through PS Thread-Index: AdbOEG1VSExaWoHfRFCsUcDpjmkeCQ== Message-ID: References: <5FCFC00E.8040703@narwani.org> List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: <5FCFC00E.8040703@narwani.org> Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: TempError X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.218.51 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.218.51; helo=mail-ej1-f51.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=SHqYvVPrv1XuR8514+CK0eJxXRXnuPk2sT/DMnkfNjw=; b=TQU3g4dJsu60Sfg6IqweTvE/ZmFEHtIUprX2cUaB3l+zZSvm56deAeip1EJwRQFh6X zPihytLOk1v5+QfVhat9wszLrwXTjad3jbZ9NsimXD6S966zsqgr3PqsSYUsQQY9KC7X pun0OMyQyWn+kjglUjFR/E62G+0b3QZ3/c+zEmnTFd0sdwgwHgjrVe2dqoNp8c6OmK8y V0qYhqibHXPozGSTLkw1wQAAQuohigM3pM90aO2bUX+di5sQYeTOVNUXSJaO89wX5HKk NTXmVImGW1NXVozxH2o5WKOyU8jSHIFpNT3+6G393QnjN2JXCw82QYf1ARLzsnS+NAyi +NnA== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.218.51) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a17:906:ce23:: with SMTP id sd3mr1301456ejb.69.1607506580865; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 01:36:20 -0800 (PST) x-topics: [EE] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Are you able to switch back to the old pump and take the same noise measurements? I find it hard to believe that such strong filtering would not virtually eliminate noise at that frequency... On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 07:05, Neil wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working on a device that takes 120VAC, converts to 5VDC with a > PCB-mounted power supply, then further reduces that to 3.3VDC with a > linear regulator. > A 3.3V microcontroller switches a relay to power a 120VAC pump. > Overview... > http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-00.jpg > > All has been great until we switched to a specific pump, which happens > to generate a LOT of conducted noise, which passes through the 5V PS, > and the 3.3V regulator, and causing the microcontroller to crash. > I did a bunch of tested and found that the noise is being conducted > through the wires back to the board through the PS, through the linear > regulator, and this is the 3.3V line... > http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-01.jpg > > I was over at someone else's place so did not have a lot of parts with > me, but... > Adding a bunch more 0.1uf bypass capacitors all over the board did not > help. > > Changing the power supply from an IRM-10-5 (industrial spec, 200mV > ripple) to MPM-10-5 (medical spec, 100mV ripple), helped reduce the rate > of the crashing... but the ripple itself wasn't causing crashing. > > Adding (non-specific size) ferrites to the pump wires, and 120VAC input > wires did not help. > I then tried to create a crude/uncalculated LC filter (which whatever > components I had on hand (33uh inductor and 1000uf capacitor, should be > low ESR), then a Pi filter (added 680 uF capacitor), and those barely > made a dent. > Eventually I added another 0.1uf capacitor to the output side of the pi > filter and that helped enough to prevent the microcontroller crashing. > But there is still a lot of noise on the 3.3V line... > http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-02.jpg > http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-03.jpg > > FWIW, this is where it ended up... > http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-04.jpg > > The noise is in the 7Mhz to 30Mhz range (prob even higher). > I feel like smaller, low-ESR ceramic caps should help, but I doubt it > will take out most of the noise. > What is the right type of filter to eliminate this noise? > > Cheers, > -Neil. > > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .