Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 11:50:42 -0800 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 0B8JgWP5003260; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 14:42:41 -0500 Received: from outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-7.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.58]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 0B8JgVrM003257 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 14:42:31 -0500 Received: from w92exedge4.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE4.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.16]) by outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 0B8JgQkA007421 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 14:42:31 -0500 Received: from w92expo26.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.32) by w92exedge4.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 14:41:26 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.98) by w92expo26.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 14:42:20 -0500 Received: from NAM12-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.55.168) by oc11exhyb2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 14:42:20 -0500 Received: from BN6PR03CA0052.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:404:4c::14) by BN3PR01MB2116.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:400:1::23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3632.17; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 19:42:19 +0000 Received: from BN8NAM11FT008.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:404:4c:cafe::a0) by BN6PR03CA0052.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:404:4c::14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3654.12 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 19:42:19 +0000 Received: from premium47-1.web-hosting.com (68.65.123.241) by BN8NAM11FT008.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.177.95) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3632.17 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 19:42:18 +0000 Received: from 107-145-246-199.res.spectrum.com ([107.145.246.199]:51771 helo=[192.168.0.108]) by premium47.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1kmis3-0025wA-Uq; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 14:42:18 -0500 From: Neil To: "piclist@mit.edu" Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 11:41:57 -0800 Subject: Re: [EE] Eliminating external noise through PS Thread-Topic: [EE] Eliminating external noise through PS Thread-Index: AdbNm2nz3vQTWfIGQ7Gc4c5patxFOA== Message-ID: <5FCFD705.2090703@narwani.org> References: <5FCFC00E.8040703@narwani.org> List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: narwani.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=narwani.org ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Reply-To:To:References:Subject:Sender:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=/4XyX8oggsRBJkoMgywNnPfGqClgTTYSV9wXqbI0wT4=; b=mCGOo3bX4KF9LK+Mrp2YkMMzDI YipDPA6z6cUXDnobdAwAk0psg+s7Ki9mvbvNUKpNSFmgsQ6yZ+zMBrGglHBmn/y9keFaG10+kRS6R No5QZnEnfEQ6EdzXz3xUn7kOwAawRD12o5wtXv8hSm6658lNb2hP5ob7vjzIKq29m7qnjDjyxiDzs 5F2PiquThtHSoP5Zh0J/xyAsr1JFbae5Nbmxt6n/OT8AvqPQYTuzOB+e+aBMiTj2/ziFMghvQvUAE GNxn1n2dinwdSEzUMYRyWbzpkrZVCxnMDlMb8EuXeAM1lUj1/HbPbS+Z85hUaSQ4fqg8XdAwiARMX hWAWsgVg==; authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is 68.65.123.241) smtp.mailfrom=narwani.org; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=narwani.org;mit.edu; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=narwani.org; user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-source-args: x-source-dir: x-antiabuse: Sender Address Domain - narwani.org x-source: x-authenticated-sender: premium47.web-hosting.com: ca4@narwani.org x-topics: [EE] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Looking at how common mode chokes work. Was not aware of these. This is the power supply I'm using (not sure if it's a flyback), and I=20 do not have any other caps... https://www.meanwell.com/Upload/PDF/MPM-10/MPM-10-SPEC.PDF Cheers, -Neil. On 12/8/2020 1:19 PM, Manu Abraham wrote: > I guess you need a common mode filter at the PSU 120V in might help. > > Other than that: > Are you using a flyback PSU ? > If so, do you have a High voltage capacitor (the one between the > primary and secondary, for the noise return path) ? > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:35 PM Neil wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm working on a device that takes 120VAC, converts to 5VDC with a >> PCB-mounted power supply, then further reduces that to 3.3VDC with a >> linear regulator. >> A 3.3V microcontroller switches a relay to power a 120VAC pump. >> Overview... >> http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-00.jpg >> >> All has been great until we switched to a specific pump, which happens >> to generate a LOT of conducted noise, which passes through the 5V PS, >> and the 3.3V regulator, and causing the microcontroller to crash. >> I did a bunch of tested and found that the noise is being conducted >> through the wires back to the board through the PS, through the linear >> regulator, and this is the 3.3V line... >> http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-01.jpg >> >> I was over at someone else's place so did not have a lot of parts with >> me, but... >> Adding a bunch more 0.1uf bypass capacitors all over the board did not h= elp. >> >> Changing the power supply from an IRM-10-5 (industrial spec, 200mV >> ripple) to MPM-10-5 (medical spec, 100mV ripple), helped reduce the rate >> of the crashing... but the ripple itself wasn't causing crashing. >> >> Adding (non-specific size) ferrites to the pump wires, and 120VAC input >> wires did not help. >> I then tried to create a crude/uncalculated LC filter (which whatever >> components I had on hand (33uh inductor and 1000uf capacitor, should be >> low ESR), then a Pi filter (added 680 uF capacitor), and those barely >> made a dent. >> Eventually I added another 0.1uf capacitor to the output side of the pi >> filter and that helped enough to prevent the microcontroller crashing. >> But there is still a lot of noise on the 3.3V line... >> http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-02.jpg >> http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-03.jpg >> >> FWIW, this is where it ended up... >> http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-04.jpg >> >> The noise is in the 7Mhz to 30Mhz range (prob even higher). >> I feel like smaller, low-ESR ceramic caps should help, but I doubt it >> will take out most of the noise. >> What is the right type of filter to eliminate this noise? >> >> Cheers, >> -Neil. >> >> -- >> http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive >> View/change your membership options at >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .