Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 10:27:23 -0800 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 0B8IKVTP023645; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:20:32 -0500 Received: from outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.15]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 0B8IKT9o023635 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:20:30 -0500 Received: from w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.15]) by outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 0B8IKLUn024166 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:20:29 -0500 Received: from oc11expo9.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.14) by w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:19:21 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb3.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.99) by oc11expo9.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:20:10 -0500 Received: from NAM02-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.36.59) by oc11exhyb3.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:20:09 -0500 Received: from DM6PR03CA0063.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:100::40) by BN3PR01MB2113.prod.exchangelabs.com (2a01:111:e400:7bb7::25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3632.17; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 18:20:06 +0000 Received: from DM6NAM11FT034.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:100:cafe::d0) by DM6PR03CA0063.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:5:100::40) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3654.12 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 18:20:06 +0000 Received: from mail-yb1-f175.google.com (209.85.219.175) by DM6NAM11FT034.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.173.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3632.17 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 18:20:06 +0000 Received: by mail-yb1-f175.google.com with SMTP id u203so1381021ybb.2 for ; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:20:06 -0800 (PST) From: Manu Abraham To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 10:19:51 -0800 Subject: Re: [EE] Eliminating external noise through PS Thread-Topic: [EE] Eliminating external noise through PS Thread-Index: AdbNj8YPA8MlJwgbRe2gZOGhoXZONg== Message-ID: References: <5FCFC00E.8040703@narwani.org> List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: <5FCFC00E.8040703@narwani.org> Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.219.175 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.219.175; helo=mail-yb1-f175.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=56HVelDgHwkrfb9xm8rTIbqLqsPwi8pYQ/hi0lytEUc=; b=vYYOvUTqhZiONx2mAkCqUnk+T9IKxB3IjH4964q0Joix8MgD90qiU/BpWWrlUUfiLx xMpJjRw0CA6/ujc0sDeqD/nuXyT/Lc3jXPTotlWqEV3M2cpvUSh+dBClsTKZd8+MukZt +YW27w3vi+3pnv90RQXvMzYKHuw2lIZwaziXiy14JqiGO050F1S/47v/I4fmTnXjcpv6 NVbrsV9rHIXQjhK270STqbNndzXS0n9PeBe2z7QBBvO4PAWnATDAf1ZD+G6ge6Y3fJuA CxgCL11IV4N3EhZfmXtiP7WvG0/ewDOe2shLxMwsvobo6TIVaaZf2WeEF61gCGJeBs3s XLoQ== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.219.175) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a25:8708:: with SMTP id a8mr10098246ybl.92.1607451605356; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:20:05 -0800 (PST) x-topics: [EE] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 I guess you need a common mode filter at the PSU 120V in might help. Other than that: Are you using a flyback PSU ? If so, do you have a High voltage capacitor (the one between the primary and secondary, for the noise return path) ? On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:35 PM Neil wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm working on a device that takes 120VAC, converts to 5VDC with a > PCB-mounted power supply, then further reduces that to 3.3VDC with a > linear regulator. > A 3.3V microcontroller switches a relay to power a 120VAC pump. > Overview... > http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-00.jpg > > All has been great until we switched to a specific pump, which happens > to generate a LOT of conducted noise, which passes through the 5V PS, > and the 3.3V regulator, and causing the microcontroller to crash. > I did a bunch of tested and found that the noise is being conducted > through the wires back to the board through the PS, through the linear > regulator, and this is the 3.3V line... > http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-01.jpg > > I was over at someone else's place so did not have a lot of parts with > me, but... > Adding a bunch more 0.1uf bypass capacitors all over the board did not he= lp. > > Changing the power supply from an IRM-10-5 (industrial spec, 200mV > ripple) to MPM-10-5 (medical spec, 100mV ripple), helped reduce the rate > of the crashing... but the ripple itself wasn't causing crashing. > > Adding (non-specific size) ferrites to the pump wires, and 120VAC input > wires did not help. > I then tried to create a crude/uncalculated LC filter (which whatever > components I had on hand (33uh inductor and 1000uf capacitor, should be > low ESR), then a Pi filter (added 680 uF capacitor), and those barely > made a dent. > Eventually I added another 0.1uf capacitor to the output side of the pi > filter and that helped enough to prevent the microcontroller crashing. > But there is still a lot of noise on the 3.3V line... > http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-02.jpg > http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-03.jpg > > FWIW, this is where it ended up... > http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-04.jpg > > The noise is in the 7Mhz to 30Mhz range (prob even higher). > I feel like smaller, low-ESR ceramic caps should help, but I doubt it > will take out most of the noise. > What is the right type of filter to eliminate this noise? > > Cheers, > -Neil. > > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .