Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 10:27:23 -0800 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 0B8IJJYR023300; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:19:28 -0500 Received: from outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-7.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.58]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 0B8IJIx9023294 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:19:18 -0500 Received: from oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE1.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.17]) by outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 0B8IIwhY002522 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:19:18 -0500 Received: from w92expo26.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.32) by oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:18:10 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.60) by w92expo26.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:19:00 -0500 Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.58.101) by oc11exhyb1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:19:00 -0500 Received: from BN0PR02CA0007.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:e4::12) by SN6PR0102MB3326.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:805:12::19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3654.12; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 18:18:58 +0000 Received: from BN8NAM11FT054.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:e4:cafe::19) by BN0PR02CA0007.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:408:e4::12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3654.12 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 18:18:58 +0000 Received: from mail-yb1-f171.google.com (209.85.219.171) by BN8NAM11FT054.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.177.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3632.17 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 18:18:58 +0000 Received: by mail-yb1-f171.google.com with SMTP id w135so11332261ybg.13 for ; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:18:58 -0800 (PST) From: roy hopkins To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 10:18:45 -0800 Subject: Re: [EE] Eliminating external noise through PS Thread-Topic: [EE] Eliminating external noise through PS Thread-Index: AdbNj8YGGqtiCkQ5T/aTgtdmQmVRnA== Message-ID: References: <5FCFC00E.8040703@narwani.org> List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: <5FCFC00E.8040703@narwani.org> Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.219.171 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.219.171; helo=mail-yb1-f171.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=sh1yYcnVEPAskGQnn+BYAbbzZAADJdPaRQuopdxklhI=; b=dCGKyealnOXCSc00bY7QC+3sGbvG2EJdLej0aGXqAd+KrvRo7qetCKRbQ02B+z5hMl 7drTli/r6XVs4XmejLKbX5xNLEcN058/sHDwbBdsi0JQHq0CmGkgIi9McJNENF9cfaMl R2BjzpqMLegygRXYGOH1gCws5a3tMhe2IM9ELh+NcqoA7WWreCxXcvsfz3JM/d4XiaT+ c28pte9mujSFRjQ9DPzpvexFcK7Y0ZHN5M07PqZ3//KsONj87lQyEMnIn520WmXHt5oU KXwCSCUBKiznFd9hIOcAkTeLuOnziQDiPeOReG5/oTnepvMlbFlaq0oh3pm1sZ6iPxct G9FQ== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.219.171) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a25:e8b:: with SMTP id 133mr31053548ybo.146.1607451537837; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:18:57 -0800 (PST) x-topics: [EE] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Run the micro on batteries? Take the micro further away from the motor power, power it from a different phase? Schottkyy Diodes on 5v to + and - to limit voltage swings to 5v +/- 0.2 volts. Harmonic filter? Roy Hopkins ZL1RJH On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 07:05, Neil wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working on a device that takes 120VAC, converts to 5VDC with a > PCB-mounted power supply, then further reduces that to 3.3VDC with a > linear regulator. > A 3.3V microcontroller switches a relay to power a 120VAC pump. > Overview... > http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-00.jpg > > All has been great until we switched to a specific pump, which happens > to generate a LOT of conducted noise, which passes through the 5V PS, > and the 3.3V regulator, and causing the microcontroller to crash. > I did a bunch of tested and found that the noise is being conducted > through the wires back to the board through the PS, through the linear > regulator, and this is the 3.3V line... > http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-01.jpg > > I was over at someone else's place so did not have a lot of parts with > me, but... > Adding a bunch more 0.1uf bypass capacitors all over the board did not > help. > > Changing the power supply from an IRM-10-5 (industrial spec, 200mV > ripple) to MPM-10-5 (medical spec, 100mV ripple), helped reduce the rate > of the crashing... but the ripple itself wasn't causing crashing. > > Adding (non-specific size) ferrites to the pump wires, and 120VAC input > wires did not help. > I then tried to create a crude/uncalculated LC filter (which whatever > components I had on hand (33uh inductor and 1000uf capacitor, should be > low ESR), then a Pi filter (added 680 uF capacitor), and those barely > made a dent. > Eventually I added another 0.1uf capacitor to the output side of the pi > filter and that helped enough to prevent the microcontroller crashing. > But there is still a lot of noise on the 3.3V line... > http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-02.jpg > http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-03.jpg > > FWIW, this is where it ended up... > http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-04.jpg > > The noise is in the 7Mhz to 30Mhz range (prob even higher). > I feel like smaller, low-ESR ceramic caps should help, but I doubt it > will take out most of the noise. > What is the right type of filter to eliminate this noise? > > Cheers, > -Neil. > > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .