Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 10:14:30 -0800 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 0B8I4Wpt020544; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:05:02 -0500 Received: from outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.15]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 0B8I4Veb020536 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:04:31 -0500 Received: from w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.15]) by outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 0B8I4Qge023217 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:04:31 -0500 Received: from oc11expo11.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.16) by w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:03:19 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb8.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.113) by oc11expo11.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:04:08 -0500 Received: from NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.55.109) by oc11exhyb8.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:04:08 -0500 Received: from CO2PR04CA0072.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:102:1::40) by CY1PR01MB2204.prod.exchangelabs.com (2a01:111:e400:c614::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3632.21; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 18:04:06 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM11FT066.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:102:1:cafe::87) by CO2PR04CA0072.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:102:1::40) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3654.12 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 18:04:06 +0000 Received: from premium47-1.web-hosting.com (68.65.123.241) by CO1NAM11FT066.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.175.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3632.17 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 18:04:05 +0000 Received: from 107-145-246-199.res.spectrum.com ([107.145.246.199]:50866 helo=[192.168.0.108]) by premium47.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1kmhLE-003OAX-TF; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 13:04:05 -0500 From: Neil To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 10:03:58 -0800 Subject: [EE] Eliminating external noise through PS Thread-Topic: [EE] Eliminating external noise through PS Thread-Index: AdbNjflMrz9AJV30RZmMVQoqN6yomA== Message-ID: <5FCFC00E.8040703@narwani.org> List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: narwani.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=narwani.org ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:To:Subject:From:Reply-To:Sender:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=pfn6SaILvVghAH/Qz1LT2H5Wp4z1VK5cE9zEt2ogU64=; b=YYb4YBzTMxdRPCXOMMzMCH80jg dAaBX8ZFh740F+He9BSy4nh34Qw9E6E3uY4qulCNtaSCgo5QcTA/W+DzpwIoJnZRiSwSy7nV/Snxt A4wfB/+28jNd3gYZ4BYex0/JVCqilgoTEi4VzPurZ+aUJx2SLa+a11zc5amTwUKOhaUDyleZ3PblM v1OviA2pf+K2doA1oFZYUeYojrUkjtelbt6a8JcFqeO3j22vsh/VJT5uJJI4SpyoXWO/c+vnZ9NKm 6YXLdCM1cECzhWrsD+lPZVoT5gzimFpuNKiXjJqQ1B/738PnenXSaZoP4Ic9cvYVt5YmIfyKGBhXt p6kewjzA==; authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is 68.65.123.241) smtp.mailfrom=narwani.org; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=narwani.org;mit.edu; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=narwani.org; user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-source-args: x-source-dir: x-antiabuse: Sender Address Domain - narwani.org x-source: x-authenticated-sender: premium47.web-hosting.com: ca4@narwani.org x-topics: [EE] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi, I'm working on a device that takes 120VAC, converts to 5VDC with a=20 PCB-mounted power supply, then further reduces that to 3.3VDC with a=20 linear regulator. A 3.3V microcontroller switches a relay to power a 120VAC pump. Overview... http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-00.jpg All has been great until we switched to a specific pump, which happens=20 to generate a LOT of conducted noise, which passes through the 5V PS,=20 and the 3.3V regulator, and causing the microcontroller to crash. I did a bunch of tested and found that the noise is being conducted=20 through the wires back to the board through the PS, through the linear=20 regulator, and this is the 3.3V line... http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-01.jpg I was over at someone else's place so did not have a lot of parts with=20 me, but... Adding a bunch more 0.1uf bypass capacitors all over the board did not help= .. Changing the power supply from an IRM-10-5 (industrial spec, 200mV=20 ripple) to MPM-10-5 (medical spec, 100mV ripple), helped reduce the rate=20 of the crashing... but the ripple itself wasn't causing crashing. Adding (non-specific size) ferrites to the pump wires, and 120VAC input=20 wires did not help. I then tried to create a crude/uncalculated LC filter (which whatever=20 components I had on hand (33uh inductor and 1000uf capacitor, should be=20 low ESR), then a Pi filter (added 680 uF capacitor), and those barely=20 made a dent. Eventually I added another 0.1uf capacitor to the output side of the pi=20 filter and that helped enough to prevent the microcontroller crashing. But there is still a lot of noise on the 3.3V line... http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-02.jpg http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-03.jpg FWIW, this is where it ended up... http://orlandorobotbuilders.com/stuff/SMNoise/20201207-SMN-04.jpg The noise is in the 7Mhz to 30Mhz range (prob even higher). I feel like smaller, low-ESR ceramic caps should help, but I doubt it=20 will take out most of the noise. What is the right type of filter to eliminate this noise? Cheers, -Neil. --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .