Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 07:46:44 -0800 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 0AQFbxFK001097; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:38:17 -0500 Received: from outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.15]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 0AQFbvUw001093 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:37:57 -0500 Received: from oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE2.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.18]) by outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 0AQFbulB002223 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:37:57 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb8.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.113) by oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:37:41 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb5.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.110) by oc11exhyb8.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:37:55 -0500 Received: from NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.70.109) by oc11exhyb5.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.110) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:37:55 -0500 Received: from DM6PR07CA0081.namprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:337::14) by BYAPR01MB4664.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:a03:90::12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3589.30; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:37:54 +0000 Received: from DM6NAM11FT005.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:337:cafe::a8) by DM6PR07CA0081.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:5:337::14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3611.20 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:37:54 +0000 Received: from elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net (209.86.89.62) by DM6NAM11FT005.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.172.238) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3611.25 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:37:54 +0000 Received: from [73.100.204.40] (helo=localhost.localdomain) by elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4) (envelope-from ) id 1kiJLF-0000PH-Hr for piclist@mit.edu; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:37:53 -0500 From: Dave Tweed To: "piclist@mit.edu" Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 07:37:52 -0800 Subject: Re: [OT] Hyperikon Retrofit LED Tubes Without Ballast and fluorescent lamps and TV! Thread-Topic: [OT] Hyperikon Retrofit LED Tubes Without Ballast and fluorescent lamps and TV! Thread-Index: AdbEC1eZZtkDlrHtSI+A66JiOPwPdA== Message-ID: <1606387072@dtweed.com> References: <20201125221458.06a56fd6300ec2bfca6379d4e10ab8d2.7f57746529.wbe@email27.godaddy.com> List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Fail (protection.outlook.com: domain of dtweed.com does not designate 209.86.89.62 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.86.89.62; helo=elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mitprod.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-mitprod-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=bHnp6Uxi87ZVK5CH828TA1V/W/fnPL1V3p0uE3+tP4o=; b=DutxklmOoGbYrdpFuMcLvTuGdguQ8W2RoSb5vcal9H7AnAWCllr+aqfkzW7GsrDcneY7p1r5Rj9X095LN7KVEeE1FPgSARzjtMgRfZ/P0JkW4APnX/QTyT1XKW0wbDOc+glakaOyDfbj07xiZmsRaVcaqNbqQFhBDtYSr40exME= authentication-results: spf=fail (sender IP is 209.86.89.62) smtp.mailfrom=dtweed.com; mit.edu; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;mit.edu; dmarc=fail action=none header.from=dtweed.com; x-originating-ip: 73.100.204.40 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-elnk-trace: 5507fdf0269a8d2672cc1e1b0924a179239a348a220c26095a62540cc20c9956be1838f55b6de7ef350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c x-topics: [OT] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Harold Hallikainen wrote: > NTSC television is interesting! It's described at > http://mai.hallikainen.org/org/FCC/FccRules/2021/73/682/ . Prior to color= , > the field rate was indeed 60 Hz, the power line frequency, to avoid > rolling "hum bars." With color, it appears everything is based on a > precise 5 MHz with the chroma subcarrier being 5 MHz * 68/88. That would be 3.863636 MHz, not even close to the correct value. Jim wrote: > The color burst frequency is 3.579545 Mhz. The exact math is 30*525*455/2/1.001 =3D 3.579545e6 Hz 30 frames per second (60 fields) 525 lines per frame 455/2 cycles per line The factor of 1.001 was chosen to make the sound subcarrier (fixed at 4.5 M= Hz for backward compatibility) an integer multiple (286x) of the horizontal li= ne rate (15734.266 Hz), which reduced the effects of interference between soun= d and both the Y and chroma components of the video. -- Dave Tweed --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .