Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 03:16:39 -0800 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 0AQB6hdm021160; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:07:05 -0500 Received: from outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-5.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.59]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 0AQB6giD021157 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:06:42 -0500 Received: from w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.15]) by outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 0AQB6g3d003845 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:06:42 -0500 Received: from oc11expo10.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.15) by w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:06:14 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb3.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.99) by oc11expo10.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:06:41 -0500 Received: from NAM11-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.57.171) by oc11exhyb3.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:06:41 -0500 Received: from DM6PR06CA0076.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:336::9) by DM5PR0102MB3576.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:4:a4::23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3589.22; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:06:40 +0000 Received: from DM6NAM11FT027.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:336:cafe::fb) by DM6PR06CA0076.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:5:336::9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3611.20 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:06:40 +0000 Received: from mail-lf1-f50.google.com (209.85.167.50) by DM6NAM11FT027.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.172.205) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3611.25 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:06:40 +0000 Received: by mail-lf1-f50.google.com with SMTP id s30so1952726lfc.4 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 03:06:40 -0800 (PST) From: Alan Pearce To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 03:06:27 -0800 Subject: Re: [OT] Hyperikon Retrofit LED Tubes Without Ballast and fluorescent lamps and TV! Thread-Topic: [OT] Hyperikon Retrofit LED Tubes Without Ballast and fluorescent lamps and TV! Thread-Index: AdbD5Zzl/i6MEbLMTh26wqiQ/uIMMg== Message-ID: References: <20201125040424.GL22162@laptop.org> <25738413ce462ef73e080cf318d7ebc0.squirrel@mai.hallikainen.org> <9a3cce321a36c000d66c5ebd94fb86bb.squirrel@mai.hallikainen.org> List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: <9a3cce321a36c000d66c5ebd94fb86bb.squirrel@mai.hallikainen.org> Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of googlemail.com designates 209.85.167.50 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.167.50; helo=mail-lf1-f50.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ROZzaWg0lMwMwX8NVcK/SmEBZFjNHnsLJPHL9jSO8xo=; b=RY7czWpZvTTG7SbNq7jLpky6flsAqfbgt4/xiAEsI8tpp1mZgkox7AAnP4uHyj2cRV 37gwcqu/EZa4bhBZjoS15mMakmPT5ARF4AmFN5hBvPNMJ8zIcau3YGFbrOvfAH0cWBf5 jnOLrN0+NJ1UlotU1jWz//zqhxRp9WCtUOPZJsqqYOb89wXXC4pVmjHSFyYm/dEdBkQ3 5AtUG9mEXu3Ah4U08IDcnv2lE+m0E9eWkDavy4DcpsaXsBavdXc6qxJyK95EGjol6Rrj vSyE5vHFDad78ZPXXrr/V26GdHIqQF2nNMEW/Y2IhezNipzqgVKzIJPoZshj2dQDkrJk mj1A== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.167.50) smtp.mailfrom=googlemail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=googlemail.com;mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=googlemail.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a19:ad04:: with SMTP id t4mr1171188lfc.577.1606388798890; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 03:06:38 -0800 (PST) x-topics: [OT] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 > the European PAL system switched the chroma phase 180 degrees > on adjacent lines (since the image is interlaced, perhaps this > works out to just being a phase switch on each field). Only the phase of the colour burst was changed on alternate lines so that the phase lock of the colour subcarrier generator in the TV set averaged out any phase shift in the transmission link. This gave a more stable colour display than the NTSC system which could get accumulated phase shift between the colour signal and the colour burst (resulting in the moniker "Never Twice the Same Colour" for NTSC). On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 at 23:42, Harold Hallikainen wrote: > > On the TV fluorescent lamps, yes the frequency was much higher than the > frame rate (though I don't remember what it was). > > NTSC television is interesting! It's described at > http://mai.hallikainen.org/org/FCC/FccRules/2021/73/682/ . Prior to color= , > the field rate was indeed 60 Hz, the power line frequency, to avoid > rolling "hum bars." With color, it appears everything is based on a > precise 5 MHz with the chroma subcarrier being 5 MHz * 68/88. The > horizontal scan rate is 2/455 * the chroma subcarrier frequency. The fiel= d > rate is then 2/525 * the horizontal scan frequency. I think that the > frequencies were chosen such that dots created by the chroma signal would > be white on one scan and black on the next, letting the eye cancel them > out. Similarly, the European PAL system switched the chroma phase 180 > degrees on adjacent lines (since the image is interlaced, perhaps this > works out to just being a phase switch on each field). Chroma phase error > resulted in a hue shift, but in opposite directions on adjacent lines. So= , > the eye averaged them out to avoid hue shift due to chroma phase drift. > Clever! > > On light flicker, movie projectors used to use an incandescent "exciter" > lamp to light the sound track. Light would pass through the film to a > photocell. At first, the film density was varied to carry the audio, but > later the black to white area (width of a white or black stripe on the > film) was varied to carry the sound. Of course, if the lamp was powered b= y > 60 Hz, you'd get 120 Hz hum in the sound. So, the obvious solution would > be to run the lamp on DC. But, many projectors instead ran the exciter > lamp on high frequency AC. There was a power oscillator to drive the > exciter lamp. > > On the NE-2, one of my earliest project was an NE-2 based relaxation > oscillator running off a B battery. Choosing component values, I could ge= t > a light flasher or get audio out of it. > > Harold > http://w6iwi.org > > > > > > -- > FCC Rules Updated Daily at http://www.hallikainen.com > Not sent from an iPhone. > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .