Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 07:14:51 -0800 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 0ADF4lW0001003; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 10:05:03 -0500 Received: from outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-7.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.58]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 0ADF4jWG000997 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 10:04:45 -0500 Received: from oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE1.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.17]) by outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 0ADF4LUI003926 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 10:04:45 -0500 Received: from w92expo17.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.71) by oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 10:04:12 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb3.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.99) by w92expo17.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 10:04:16 -0500 Received: from NAM11-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.56.177) by oc11exhyb3.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 10:04:15 -0500 Received: from MWHPR20CA0046.namprd20.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:ed::32) by MN2PR01MB5967.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:208:192::32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3541.24; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 15:04:14 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM11FT018.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:ed:cafe::d) by MWHPR20CA0046.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:300:ed::32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3541.25 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 15:04:14 +0000 Received: from NAM12-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (40.107.237.127) by CO1NAM11FT018.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.175.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3541.22 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 15:04:13 +0000 Received: from CY4PR01MB2407.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:903:6d::17) by CY4PR01MB3301.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:903:e4::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3541.22; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 15:04:12 +0000 Received: from CY4PR01MB2407.prod.exchangelabs.com ([fe80::20f3:edaa:e5f9:37f2]) by CY4PR01MB2407.prod.exchangelabs.com ([fe80::20f3:edaa:e5f9:37f2%12]) with mapi id 15.20.3541.025; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 15:04:12 +0000 From: David Van Horn To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. CC: ApptechNZ Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 07:04:12 -0800 Subject: =?Windows-1252?Q?RE:_[EE]::_Test_of_MINI-360_(MP2307-based)_=933A=94_Buck?= =?Windows-1252?Q?_Converter_Module?= Thread-Topic: =?Windows-1252?Q?[EE]::_Test_of_MINI-360_(MP2307-based)_=933A=94_Buck_Con?= =?Windows-1252?Q?verter_Module?= Thread-Index: AQHWubS7YVgFqMvE2EeBKJvDiN3VUanGHOUAgAAMDpA= Message-ID: References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of backcountryaccess.com designates 40.107.237.127 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=40.107.237.127; helo=NAM12-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=k2mdv.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-k2mdv-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=+m2+LwBolWFzwzoO/j2kBbYE+iWoo3L7E5YTxrA2xvY=; b=BAsS/8/c3jHVQIuD8/AIFB4bR8J3tVKBtIwlVCv87CK3VMwg4OQKUl0EAYY95nk+oNJUgoshKfgk3wyLnqe4rmOJ0g1XvoX+nm4GdOXhFlnSoMePNnDC0tOdmEUhaoFjamvwF+apXciULMBqwHdjGV3UabkT7u+XOA2qnBXunow= authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 40.107.237.127) smtp.mailfrom=backcountryaccess.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=k2mdv.onmicrosoft.com; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=backcountryaccess.com; x-originating-ip: [74.220.37.42] errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-topics: [EE] x-mime-autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by PCH.mit.edu id 0ADF4jWG000997 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Whenever I see "up to" in a data sheet, I immediately think "and down to?" -- David VanHorn Lead Hardware Engineer Backcountry Access, Inc. 2820 Wilderness Pl, Unit H Boulder, CO =A080301 USA phone:=A0303-417-1345 =A0x110 email:=A0david.vanhorn@backcountryaccess.com=A0 -----Original Message----- From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu On Behalf Of Jason = White Sent: Friday, November 13, 2020 7:21 AM To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Cc: ApptechNZ Subject: Re: [EE]:: Test of MINI-360 (MP2307-based) =933A=94 Buck Converter= Module That's interesting, 10% efficiency from a poorly designed smps! I will have= to be careful if I ever consider using ebay modules in projects. On Friday, November 13, 2020, RussellMc wrote: > Summary: A very thorough and useful test of what can be a useful buck=20 > converter module, if you buy the good ones. > > The "Mini 360" is a widely available (usually Asian sourced) low cost=20 > buck converter module. > Claimed specifications vary but typical would be1-17V output,=20 > 4.75V-23V input, 1.8A current (3A maximum) and up to 96% conversion=20 > efficiency As ever YMMV, and in practice not only MYMV but may vary=20 > very substantially. Some products may approach the claimed efficiency=20 > and power capability. Others very certainly don't. > (eg around 60% efficiency at 500 mA out and around 10% efficiency at=20 > 20 mA out). > > This 2018 Techzone test investigates performance and reasons why some=20 > Mini > 360 modules are less useful than a linear regulator. > > https://goughlui.com/2018/07/04/tested-mini-360-mp2307- > based-3a-buck-converter-module/ > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive=20 > View/change your membership options at=20 > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > -- Jason White -- http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/chang= e your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclis= t --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .