Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 18:56:28 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 09C1kMOg015856; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 21:46:56 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.15]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 09C1kKC7015853 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 21:46:20 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE2.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.18]) by outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 09C1kKTQ009100 for ; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 21:46:20 -0400 Received: from w92expo18.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.72) by oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 21:45:50 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.98) by w92expo18.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.72) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 21:46:19 -0400 Received: from NAM12-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.55.168) by oc11exhyb2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 21:46:19 -0400 Received: from MW3PR06CA0012.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:2a::17) by BL0PR01MB4004.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:208:49::27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3455.23; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 01:46:18 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM03FT055.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:2a:cafe::43) by MW3PR06CA0012.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:303:2a::17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3455.21 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 01:46:18 +0000 Received: from mail-ej1-f51.google.com (209.85.218.51) by CO1NAM03FT055.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.81.162) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3455.23 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 01:46:17 +0000 Received: by mail-ej1-f51.google.com with SMTP id e22so20993808ejr.4 for ; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 18:46:17 -0700 (PDT) From: RussellMc To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. CC: ApptechNZ , "ken@elecsyn.com" Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2020 18:45:37 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] Looking for equivalent IC to HT4928S Lithium Ion Charger Thread-Topic: [EE] Looking for equivalent IC to HT4928S Lithium Ion Charger Thread-Index: AdagOubHJQVE95JpRMilkVNQ6OZqXg== Message-ID: References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: TempError X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.218.51 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.218.51; helo=mail-ej1-f51.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8q5BykNRVjkBS+yi+Shj0T0nDAVk7wYYznezxu4II+U=; b=fBM1unu16u4wQXHOjusZzENI3DRe8p49L8lsteNlMZF0CRnTk9ne9YhH7fVtTiOxjj 1A84PGcXNP1pkkXazoQabhyA+yem4Xw4UJil/0L559rdVJZY+BIRb4upISb73p4AAoLT Rz/nmBPCBTff/nHfpSJO0aQtd4us7RtHwO6uTsLS39JGziR1i5o48qweg8Yurf0I8S4b efGgOWCXpvVUha5ctcabEHR8fgxdc15PF82uBm6gtGB4KOKWHPxvWZ6W9QyAQRXCE2MN sRzxhNOPOi+NPZYoh4tCt3HY4zgSCtTyZIrJd222JYsygRYE4f1Ms5dgT+SRfZLBEICH prng== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.218.51) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a17:906:d186:: with SMTP id c6mr24579153ejz.298.1602467176109; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 18:46:16 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [EE] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Many of the powerbank ICs are potentially suitable. Finding them is another matter: HT4928 allegedly available here China / HK but mentions manufacturers in Europe & US https://www.jotrin.com/product/parts/HT4928S MP2637 QFN https://www.monolithicpower.com/en/documentview/productdocument/index/versi= on/2/document_type/Datasheet/lang/en/sku/MP2637/document_id/1441 Digikey $3.45/1 https://www.digikey.com/en/products/filter/pmic-battery-chargers/781?s=3DN4= IgTCBcDaILIAUwDYDMB2EBdAvkA Here is a list of IPxxxx devices http://www.injoinic.com/product_detail/id/21.html?lang=3Den-us Datasheet links at right - many live. Some of the "English" ones are in Chinee. Some in English Examples only: ESOP8 http://www.injoinic.com/wwwroot/uploads/files/20200221/b4bef990cae89a87fc31= 80cc3b76b833.pdf ESOP16 http://www.injoinic.com/wwwroot/uploads/files/20200221/5edb08a79152c9ee2ca8= ea29a5d5ad25.pdf IP5330 - 19 pages in English 3A charge / discharge. 92%+ claimed efficiency. 150 uA standby. http://www.injoinic.com/wwwroot/uploads/files/20200221/cefcc6a7321517587740= 84f3149eed3b.pdf Russell On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 at 19:33, Jim Ruxton wrote: > I was wondering if anyone has come across an IC that is more readily > available than the Hotchip HT4928S discussed here : > http://blog.pagefault-limited.co.uk/hotchip-ht4928s-ver1-1-english-pdf > but is functionally equivalent. > > What is special about it is that as well as the necessary charging > functions it has boost circuitry (with an added inductor ) to supply 5 > volts directly from the charged LiIon battery. I could design my board > with any number of charging ICs followed by a voltage booster but it's > nice that it's all in one chip. > > Thanks for any tips. > > Jim > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .