Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 00:35:45 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 0997Rdse019058; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 03:28:04 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-5.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.59]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 0997RcpD019055 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 03:27:38 -0400 Received: from w92exedge4.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE4.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.16]) by outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 0997RaI1026764 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 03:27:38 -0400 Received: from w92expo8.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.62) by w92exedge4.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 03:26:38 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb3.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.99) by w92expo8.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.62) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 03:27:36 -0400 Received: from NAM11-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.56.177) by oc11exhyb3.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 03:27:36 -0400 Received: from DM6PR06CA0018.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:120::31) by BYAPR01MB5703.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:a03:123::22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3455.23; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 07:27:35 +0000 Received: from DM3NAM03FT040.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:120:cafe::e) by DM6PR06CA0018.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:5:120::31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3455.23 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 07:27:34 +0000 Received: from mail-oi1-f171.google.com (209.85.167.171) by DM3NAM03FT040.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.83.222) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3455.23 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 07:27:34 +0000 Received: by mail-oi1-f171.google.com with SMTP id x62so9249507oix.11 for ; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 00:27:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Clint Jay To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 00:27:22 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] Looking for equivalent IC to HT4928S Lithium Ion Charger Thread-Topic: [EE] Looking for equivalent IC to HT4928S Lithium Ion Charger Thread-Index: AdaeDs0lR+ensj1iQi25YjF4DK9TNw== Message-ID: References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.167.171 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.167.171; helo=mail-oi1-f171.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=tJgxj2PpfnqGLMxSa4gpwLZONkjlaAw76nGorcd1A4w=; b=bi6lAFAbINSca8JVXWRUhd2G95PObttktILkh50LFa1H5MklNDl93Ymh/kFobbI0h1 2729QIQ4VqauoOHbs76EW+J0vIxIrMxeNScf5IDGYzAUXjlqHL47SNukX1c5tSZh022h ezd//GEmXWGD5KFkDCB+osZaJ/W5OhyppmdW8cPjCOKGXVjGUU8qCGFYdvbHtVyRttD5 s8d0iDJcW9wNlEnMpvfkSWEZijBt5gIYV/Z90ctbKLzuH5CeE8DUnRLRE3adOhPPuhQf yT4gpprQJmdQ4iVkXgwQnhdTU61VYtGCLZ8F0Z8V6IXWAgKCfu2c0FAPXfVJNvFAdm7w yk1g== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.167.171) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a05:6808:216:: with SMTP id l22mr1553914oie.124.1602228454185; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 00:27:34 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [EE] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 No immediate alternative but I might consider buying up a few dollar store Li-Ion power banks and dissecting them to find out what they use. The board on the blog has holes for cell contacts to make such a device. On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 at 07:33, Jim Ruxton wrote: > I was wondering if anyone has come across an IC that is more readily > available than the Hotchip HT4928S discussed here : > http://blog.pagefault-limited.co.uk/hotchip-ht4928s-ver1-1-english-pdf > but is functionally equivalent. > > What is special about it is that as well as the necessary charging > functions it has boost circuitry (with an added inductor ) to supply 5 > volts directly from the charged LiIon battery. I could design my board > with any number of charging ICs followed by a voltage booster but it's > nice that it's all in one chip. > > Thanks for any tips. > > Jim > > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 Clint. M0UAW IO83 *No trees were harmed in the sending of this mail. However, a large number of electrons were greatly inconvenienced.* --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .