Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 14:43:13 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 096LYSqM020730; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 17:34:51 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-7.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.58]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 096LYRgL020726 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 17:34:27 -0400 Received: from w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.15]) by outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 096LYPYf026347 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 17:34:27 -0400 Received: from w92expo16.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.70) by w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 17:33:19 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb5.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.110) by w92expo16.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.70) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 17:34:08 -0400 Received: from NAM11-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.57.173) by oc11exhyb5.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.110) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 17:34:08 -0400 Received: from DM6PR02CA0066.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:177::43) by SN6PR01MB5277.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:805:cb::20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3455.21; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 21:34:07 +0000 Received: from DM3NAM03FT007.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:177:cafe::46) by DM6PR02CA0066.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:5:177::43) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3433.35 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 21:34:07 +0000 Received: from mail-ot1-f47.google.com (209.85.210.47) by DM3NAM03FT007.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.82.68) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3433.34 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 21:34:07 +0000 Received: by mail-ot1-f47.google.com with SMTP id a2so222233otr.11 for ; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 14:34:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Clint Jay To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 14:33:54 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] Re: Lithium battery confusion. Thread-Topic: [EE] Re: Lithium battery confusion. Thread-Index: AdacKbFZkyQOGFPzSNGnfHkRQWPE1Q== Message-ID: References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.210.47 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.210.47; helo=mail-ot1-f47.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=iDXK1yrv8qyoMZ52jY7Nm9OYf23Y3ifsKYxEyXjtSg8=; b=KHzjDU5BFboo90Hhwm+sAcymyhjH9H5GupY+gUYGdWcvPpo6eXfcxaOnvQAwVd8lDg hwkWB8A6x9ulnldbQtKBEx/oPVswd8s9gfY86xHIpFrLXyJ6zM0WD8LsQ5EPI4/x9lE/ /P4VHxGyZFbln4+yJb1BOpVH/hyctxtbpD/28vCJ02ZYbaFUkIp3ZqzmiIp9VQnOEPFM +s73MgUiQHC9fI0wyaBumwjiB1GR+LyRaONmgOBNMutBPDiG5eNY3A0DQ22uM0jyc6pq Te/B6v6iJrhYN8d7udTmg967xGfLgOFhGNHb9FoZDdRO/96rAqKUBjnE/JcnLj/xPGTN vJOQ== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.210.47) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a9d:7084:: with SMTP id l4mr4384643otj.161.1602020046402; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 14:34:06 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [EE] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 3.8V cells are now being used in Laptop battery packs On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 19:54, Dwayne Reid wrote: > Topic tag added > > Russell M is probably best to answer this but I'll pass on what I've > learned over the years. > > As far as I know, standard Li-Ion and Lipo cells have almost > identical chemistry. There used to be a slight difference between > cells from different manufacturers in the anode material used. This > lead to different nominal voltages (3.6V xs 3.7V) where the maximum > charge voltage was 4.1V for the 3.6V cell and 4.2V for the 3.7V cell. > > Also as far as I know, most Li-Ion and Lipo cells are now of the 3.7V > nominal voltage version. > > Do note that I am NOT talking about the LIFEPO4 cells (3.2V nominal). > > The charger module that you linked to seems entirely > appropriate. Stupid expensive, though. There are far less expensive > ready-made chargers available from Oh So Many Asian suppliers. > > Or - you could roll your own with free samples from Microchip. I use > their MCP73831T-2DCI/OT in two of the products that we have built in > the past. Less than Can $0.50 in 25 lot or free if you ask Microchip > nicely. > > dwayne > > > At 11:01 AM 10/6/2020, David C Brown wrote: > >I have cell phone battery from a reputable manufacturer - Motorola - > which > >is marked > >3.8v Lithium Ion Polymer battery. And I am seeking a charger module. > > > >I was under the impression that Li-ion and Li-poly were different > >chemistries which require different charging regimes. Is that not so. > > > >And would this simple module https://tinyurl.com/y48gp4hu be suitable. > >__________________________________________ > >David C Brown > >43 Bings Road > >Whaley Bridge > >High Peak Phone: 01663 733236 > >Derbyshire eMail: dcb.home@gmail.com > >SK23 7ND web: www.bings-knowle.co.uk/dcb > > > > > -- > Dwayne Reid > Trinity Electronics Systems Ltd Edmonton, AB, CANADA > 780-489-3199 voice 780-487-6397 fax 888-489-3199 Toll Free > www.trinity-electronics.com > Custom Electronics Design and Manufacturing > > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 Clint. M0UAW IO83 *No trees were harmed in the sending of this mail. However, a large number of electrons were greatly inconvenienced.* --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .