Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 12:44:57 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 096Jan1d002391; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 15:36:57 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-3.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.13]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 096JagEX002377 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 15:36:48 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE1.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.17]) by outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 096JadAK009111 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 15:36:48 -0400 Received: from w92expo30.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.42) by oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 15:35:53 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb5.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.110) by w92expo30.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 15:36:43 -0400 Received: from NAM12-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.55.177) by oc11exhyb5.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.110) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 15:36:43 -0400 Received: from DM5PR1401CA0008.namprd14.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:4a::18) by BYAPR01MB5302.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:a03:91::20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3455.21; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 19:36:42 +0000 Received: from DM3NAM03FT046.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:4a:cafe::a) by DM5PR1401CA0008.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:4:4a::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3433.35 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 19:36:42 +0000 Received: from mail-ed1-f43.google.com (209.85.208.43) by DM3NAM03FT046.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.83.87) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3433.34 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 19:36:42 +0000 Received: by mail-ed1-f43.google.com with SMTP id p13so8907323edi.7 for ; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 12:36:42 -0700 (PDT) From: David C Brown To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 12:36:33 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] Re: Lithium battery confusion. Thread-Topic: [EE] Re: Lithium battery confusion. Thread-Index: AdacGSvGxdIw8OFoRe2Ud24ycWUqQg== Message-ID: References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: TempError X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.208.43 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.208.43; helo=mail-ed1-f43.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=H+JVaqzgjOa6ieaGubR46nU++4jJOiyah46czO0bozA=; b=SxFnzVnvU2Aqf7pS+pmYrUUlkGAXW/VPG/Md4/iNJcMHeqGX+oMI8rGjuHfPBgx5te OeGbobEHjUbRIX5gLw/fPzD8jBlsk6+zXTZU1iBzAIMMR4VGTXmuQrucI03LHpkeqbzK QOcuDO7iQbhd9P+aIG11OmqFEFnZotubxESYE9wFsw1sp8DoegB3XHd07aUVULl/TXA2 SCHLKLhM5c45Ttdq5ujZ2yvkg4aZiRxxzoBUCK2ssz6NZZxEWgv2H8V6u0FP7x089N3B NvuEiokJM6BdWLr04EwcH65Po/oICwvdxDXL9CkUL7pLOb1yL1yLcWETEzo0VU/VBPB3 08zA== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.208.43) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:aa7:cf93:: with SMTP id z19mr3817151edx.26.1602013000921; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 12:36:40 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [EE] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Thanks for that. Yres the ADAFRUIT charger is expensive but I can have one on Thursday rather than waiting six weeks for one to come from Asia and turn out to be mechanically incompatible. Go the teeshirt on that. __________________________________________ David C Brown 43 Bings Road Whaley Bridge High Peak Phone: 01663 733236 Derbyshire eMail: dcb.home@gmail.com SK23 7ND web: www.bings-knowle.co.uk/dcb *Sent from my etch-a-sketch* On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 19:54, Dwayne Reid wrote: > Topic tag added > > Russell M is probably best to answer this but I'll pass on what I've > learned over the years. > > As far as I know, standard Li-Ion and Lipo cells have almost > identical chemistry. There used to be a slight difference between > cells from different manufacturers in the anode material used. This > lead to different nominal voltages (3.6V xs 3.7V) where the maximum > charge voltage was 4.1V for the 3.6V cell and 4.2V for the 3.7V cell. > > Also as far as I know, most Li-Ion and Lipo cells are now of the 3.7V > nominal voltage version. > > Do note that I am NOT talking about the LIFEPO4 cells (3.2V nominal). > > The charger module that you linked to seems entirely > appropriate. Stupid expensive, though. There are far less expensive > ready-made chargers available from Oh So Many Asian suppliers. > > Or - you could roll your own with free samples from Microchip. I use > their MCP73831T-2DCI/OT in two of the products that we have built in > the past. Less than Can $0.50 in 25 lot or free if you ask Microchip > nicely. > > dwayne > > > At 11:01 AM 10/6/2020, David C Brown wrote: > >I have cell phone battery from a reputable manufacturer - Motorola - > which > >is marked > >3.8v Lithium Ion Polymer battery. And I am seeking a charger module. > > > >I was under the impression that Li-ion and Li-poly were different > >chemistries which require different charging regimes. Is that not so. > > > >And would this simple module https://tinyurl.com/y48gp4hu be suitable. > >__________________________________________ > >David C Brown > >43 Bings Road > >Whaley Bridge > >High Peak Phone: 01663 733236 > >Derbyshire eMail: dcb.home@gmail.com > >SK23 7ND web: www.bings-knowle.co.uk/dcb > > > > > -- > Dwayne Reid > Trinity Electronics Systems Ltd Edmonton, AB, CANADA > 780-489-3199 voice 780-487-6397 fax 888-489-3199 Toll Free > www.trinity-electronics.com > Custom Electronics Design and Manufacturing > > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .