Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 15:46:24 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 08OMa2wN016259; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:36:12 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-3.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.13]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 08OMa11Z016256 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:36:01 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE1.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.17]) by outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 08OMa0J6026838 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:36:01 -0400 Received: from oc11expo32.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.113) by oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:35:31 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb3.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.99) by oc11expo32.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:36:00 -0400 Received: from NAM02-BL2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.38.59) by oc11exhyb3.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:36:00 -0400 Received: from DM6PR02CA0092.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:1f4::33) by CH2PR01MB5751.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:610:3f::32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3391.19; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 22:35:59 +0000 Received: from DM3NAM03FT062.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:1f4:cafe::b9) by DM6PR02CA0092.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:5:1f4::33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3412.20 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 22:35:59 +0000 Received: from premium47-1.web-hosting.com (68.65.123.241) by DM3NAM03FT062.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.83.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3412.21 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 22:35:59 +0000 Received: from 107-145-246-199.res.spectrum.com ([107.145.246.199]:49166 helo=[192.168.10.110]) by premium47.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1kLZqE-000ufF-Ay; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:35:58 -0400 From: Neil To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 15:35:52 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] Hand soldering fine pitch packages Thread-Topic: [EE] Hand soldering fine pitch packages Thread-Index: AdaSxIhvgwtXRen7TtCga1gTALI4kg== Message-ID: <5F6D1F48.9070304@narwani.org> References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: narwani.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=narwani.org ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:From:To:References:Subject:Sender:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=YbhHwWg0hJHNGVRyhCS72POyM5yn44uqDsqCHCpwY8I=; b=qxTLGIRaGPrDlNQzkLITcXrMNb gdGD3f/h5/Ixmb1Hwxka9yLKAINJR5IujfjvZINBd1Abs0VqbE033bwwYgq842ispa9Rn1inT3RTm pdt2p4qsAEaW4QaM1nzt7THdNur2U7ap2zRNlujzT6oe9O3sGCDBvpdbE08SIDec3iOGYxUgYbnhG y6uhVAOs7LXcSiAKqPtE5b2JK6ZU6KXcOIBzS2LkWdx2kDqeDSLSi7I7mALfi6+V2Cf/oepPPDGqk dyN/cfI8ViKRlPgv7kYi8WUx/ZgA19viWKKNySzL76/MZ8lrhShCx6zHhW3Hp9Hci2Z0+JeUgU7cC Ax+MCf0Q==; authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is 68.65.123.241) smtp.mailfrom=narwani.org; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=narwani.org;mit.edu; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=narwani.org; user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-source-args: x-source-dir: x-antiabuse: Sender Address Domain - narwani.org x-source: x-authenticated-sender: premium47.web-hosting.com: ca4@narwani.org x-topics: [EE] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 I run the length of the wick across all the pins, then drag the=20 soldering tip across the wick, while lifting the wick perpendicularly=20 away from pins. But NEVER sliding the wick on the pins, as that will catch the pins and=20 bent them very easily. On 9/24/2020 6:24 PM, Bob Blick wrote: > Give my method a try sometime. It uses far less solder and solder wick, b= ut the real advantage for me is less cleanup. Flood filling adds a lot of b= urned flux. With my method, you only need to use a little bit of flux, and = the solder on the wick has no remaining flux. And while you are dragging th= e wick, it's doing the soldering and pulling some of the fresh hot flux awa= y. > > Anyway, I suggest giving it a try. So far I haven't decided which directi= on to face the wick works best, facing in, out, or sideways from the part. > > Friendly regards, Bob > > ________________________________________ > From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu on behalf of K S > Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2020 2:49 PM > To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. > Subject: Re: [EE] Hand soldering fine pitch packages > > I flood (like really flood) the entire row with solder, let it set, then > place the PCB on its edge so the row is now vertical and slowly remelt th= e > solder from top to bottom. The surface tension collects the excess on the > way down and usually, for a 0.4mm pitch, only the last 2 or 3 pins requir= e > a touch-up with wick. For all four rows of a 120 pin QFP this usually tak= es > a lot less time than the aligning part. Extra flux not usually required. > Make sure you don't drop the molten blob of solder at the end on other > parts of the board. > -- > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .