Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:08:16 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 08OIv6mp012380; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:57:06 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-3.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.13]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 08OIv4rT012376 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:57:04 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE2.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.18]) by outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 08OIuqGn012462 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:57:03 -0400 Received: from w92exhyb8.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.113) by oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:56:30 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb4.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.100) by w92exhyb8.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:56:43 -0400 Received: from NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.59.172) by oc11exhyb4.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:56:43 -0400 Received: from DM5PR06CA0052.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:37::14) by MW4PR01MB6370.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:303:75::17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3412.21; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:56:42 +0000 Received: from DM3NAM03FT019.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:37:cafe::6d) by DM5PR06CA0052.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:3:37::14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3412.20 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:56:42 +0000 Received: from premium47-1.web-hosting.com (68.65.123.241) by DM3NAM03FT019.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.82.197) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3412.21 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:56:42 +0000 Received: from 107-145-246-199.res.spectrum.com ([107.145.246.199]:63933 helo=[192.168.10.110]) by premium47.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1kLWQ1-004MJ3-EM; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:56:41 -0400 From: Neil To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 11:56:35 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] Hand soldering fine pitch packages Thread-Topic: [EE] Hand soldering fine pitch packages Thread-Index: AdaSpg7li8Gd1pD5T6KOrSBEci+bHw== Message-ID: <5F6CEBE3.9080804@narwani.org> References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: narwani.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=narwani.org ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Reply-To:To:References:Subject:Sender:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=G3+A6pFWnyp0/TQCIshLHAqRCIVAX5DwNDcF8YJgm4c=; b=Un+BPsCeQLepw8usraQ9OtdYux kOj/cP7eWlg9rafk7ie89Dx96UgaUn+PazcjqzMEkEOS9SK8/LWUbQXkzlL1jwhsUhxIGuQsBIw9T kJl5klXcD//LzSrSFSuWXpqAe7OuE54D303GXrRuNs4KtZ0VRHUQDxHiw0OiwQDUby3j/qLAChrMZ +BjyE59pJbPoLm12TE5tdhZq28zETW+f4tW/FBtRcbPHDQWt7uqe6Lh394F+PvOzI4GBSKwElaWK5 G+dJqqIYEjf3YrfFzobBMnwHfL/Xg4bOmP0fOxApCApNW7YOcwybUFi5JhEGi001qCdDqIsW7C+7U o/npZhKQ==; authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is 68.65.123.241) smtp.mailfrom=narwani.org; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=narwani.org;mit.edu; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=narwani.org; user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-source-args: x-source-dir: x-antiabuse: Sender Address Domain - narwani.org x-source: x-authenticated-sender: premium47.web-hosting.com: ca4@narwani.org x-topics: [EE] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 That's mostly what I do for SSOP's and LQFP's... tack, align/tweak,=20 flood solder, wick, then de-flux. I don't even add flux anywhere because I'm flood soldering. Some years ago, I went through an eval of several different wicks (as=20 I've done for solders, solder pastes, tweezers, flush cutters, etc ;) )=20 and found one that worked great without adding flux... Techspray 1821=20 (for no-clean flux). I don't know if it's the most expensive, but it's=20 the functionally best one I've found for my uses. Cheers, -Neil. On 9/24/2020 2:30 PM, Bob Blick wrote: > What I describe may already be a common practice, but it's something I've= just recently started doing. > > When hand soldering an IC, something like a 0.5mm pitch LQFP, I would usu= ally tack a couple of pins down, maybe brush on a little liquid flux, solde= r the rest of the pins as best I could, then clear all the shorts and even = the soldering out with solder wick. Then clean the flux off and inspect. > > But lately what I do is skip the soldering part, just go straight to the = solder wick. The wick needs to have some solder on it. In other words, appl= y the solder with the product meant to remove solder. > > Anyway, I've found it to be faster and cleaner, and uses less solder and = less solder wick. > > And, of course, buy the most expensive solder wick you can find. > > Cheers, > Bob --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .