Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:07:33 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 08OIsZKr011964; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:54:45 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-5.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.59]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 08OIsYqs011952 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:54:34 -0400 Received: from w92exedge4.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE4.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.16]) by outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 08OIsJAm003920 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:54:34 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb4.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.100) by w92exedge4.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:53:46 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb3.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.99) by oc11exhyb4.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:54:16 -0400 Received: from NAM04-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.46.52) by oc11exhyb3.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:54:16 -0400 Received: from DM3PR12CA0068.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:0:57::12) by CY4PR01MB2774.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:903:ea::12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3412.20; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:54:15 +0000 Received: from DM3NAM03FT045.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:0:57:cafe::41) by DM3PR12CA0068.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:0:57::12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3412.21 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:54:14 +0000 Received: from NAM11-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (40.92.19.31) by DM3NAM03FT045.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.82.208) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3412.21 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:54:14 +0000 Received: from BN8NAM11FT007.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc4b::41) by BN8NAM11HT163.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc4b::138) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3412.21; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:54:14 +0000 Received: from BYAPR06MB4359.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc4b::45) by BN8NAM11FT007.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc4b::365) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3412.21 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:54:14 +0000 Received: from BYAPR06MB4359.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c8f5:2c85:be0f:26f4]) by BYAPR06MB4359.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c8f5:2c85:be0f:26f4%6]) with mapi id 15.20.3391.027; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:54:13 +0000 From: Randy Dawson To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 11:54:13 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] Hand soldering fine pitch packages Thread-Topic: [EE] Hand soldering fine pitch packages Thread-Index: AQHWkp98x1dZkvwAL0m2+gFZ1v5Uwal4IeV9 Message-ID: References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of hotmail.com designates 40.92.19.31 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=40.92.19.31; helo=NAM11-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=xkrbDtGB/a5Jx7p4yhW1L1sgm2u7Rc1mIgcObGeGK6k=; b=Dc4lUU0Z72T9Z838H6GVi3NdXAnuG45ozlpJJtQzfT+bR249vzhkvpPNVtp+ik9GziZKtP5I9XBOv0KIONYhOHC5YR2Ln7Z0N7OK+I9s+1xDK87gBnouQa5BlI6zkjfcSHr6ALs1x3L1H2xahhUtYL5EkfntkArKyHBKcgyHaO72l4o78wHwm7DBPPWs3A58wCM89u5JXynK3Lmpt1bs9tcpPraA0MMwF000e9Dot6g9EbXy+Q8AyhAqsHAyE6zadEzwj9OLm9HqWVBxgwLT6YzIucaweUNS/je4eAwK3riVWy171YWjHl5GToGGqTPO5prOJog/M73b6pdneSef3Q== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 40.92.19.31) smtp.mailfrom=hotmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=hotmail.com; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=hotmail.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-topics: [EE] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 What works for me, is the liquid flux, the water soluble stuff that smells = like citrus. Tack the corner pins, as you suggest. Then you can 'rake' the iron down the side of the package, no solder requir= ed if the PCB is tined. Solder surface tension solders all the pins without shorts. Randy ________________________________ From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu on behalf of Bob Bl= ick Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2020 11:30 AM To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Subject: [EE] Hand soldering fine pitch packages What I describe may already be a common practice, but it's something I've j= ust recently started doing. When hand soldering an IC, something like a 0.5mm pitch LQFP, I would usual= ly tack a couple of pins down, maybe brush on a little liquid flux, solder = the rest of the pins as best I could, then clear all the shorts and even th= e soldering out with solder wick. Then clean the flux off and inspect. But lately what I do is skip the soldering part, just go straight to the so= lder wick. The wick needs to have some solder on it. In other words, apply = the solder with the product meant to remove solder. Anyway, I've found it to be faster and cleaner, and uses less solder and le= ss solder wick. And, of course, buy the most expensive solder wick you can find. Cheers, Bob -- http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .