Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 05:46:36 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 08DCa4AQ024409; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 08:36:12 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-7.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.58]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 08DCa3DB024404 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 08:36:04 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE2.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.18]) by outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 08DCZvti018381 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 08:36:03 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.98) by oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 08:35:51 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb8.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.113) by oc11exhyb2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 08:35:54 -0400 Received: from NAM04-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.45.50) by oc11exhyb8.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 08:35:54 -0400 Received: from DM5PR1101CA0009.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:4c::19) by BN7PR01MB3681.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:406:86::12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.16; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 12:35:52 +0000 Received: from DM3NAM03FT012.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:4c:cafe::ce) by DM5PR1101CA0009.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:4:4c::19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.16 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 12:35:52 +0000 Received: from mail-ej1-f52.google.com (209.85.218.52) by DM3NAM03FT012.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.82.116) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.16 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 12:35:52 +0000 Received: by mail-ej1-f52.google.com with SMTP id z22so19414833ejl.7 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 05:35:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 2002:a54:23c8:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 05:35:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Jason White To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2020 05:35:50 -0700 Subject: [OT] Socializing over Ham radio? (as a "young person", and the usability of the upper HF bands) Thread-Topic: [OT] Socializing over Ham radio? (as a "young person", and the usability of the upper HF bands) Thread-Index: AdaJy+r6I1BojdkmR8GkEapZivR/jQ== Message-ID: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.218.52 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.218.52; helo=mail-ej1-f52.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=rBdXUyNOKbWxURaGn5eJLw8bdV6qPys/WsraFVCjeC4=; b=CjrsJyGx1qltV24cmdWKHuHlebtzamJ+lqw7Pycno955G20z/Hwqfsrt/OS+mCaKjT rfhBN78beYGX3g5TIij4gDAOoATo9VoPFfz6fjaAttP67XTizzk5RfdcEJyaZakVPm3F SLLt6Rs1iK8iF4pfSXJ4Up6onR5sdBRtqOVxxuDkxcxUwl87tzBUEWQTizdA7X8juDx5 tCqBXyHhTn5UvG8KSDb0xNIcSltFDWJ1E5Q/NC7y97c+t2xMNMdYI8qx/5lKtmhyHd4W te7jQ1CWgfbrGyjWia8Fm+eL873PFJ0QXa282faEwEr9JzM+fwP9eVjANtWlG3CirBPZ 2fZQ== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.218.52) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a17:906:d78d:: with SMTP id pj13mr10370499ejb.15.1600000551006; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 05:35:51 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [OT] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi everyone, I'm a fairly recent college graduate. The socially awkward engineering type. I was wondering if Ham radio could be a viable way to "expand one's social circle" - perhaps by participating in local ham club nets. My impression is that ham radio consists predominantly of retirement age folk. And, that outside of university/college run ham clubs that I'd be unlikely to encounter many people my own age. With the advent of "advanced" digital modes - the distinction between the experience of talking over the radio and talking in an internet chat room is blurred. I find myself questioning the value of investing in tbe purchase and setup radio equipment/antennas. I got a technician license in 2015 and a Boefeng UV-5 handheld radio. At the time the goal was to tinker with and build some RF circuits and socialize. I found that the local 2M nets were not much to my liking - my transmit power was low, and even on close repeaters I rarely could manage to get a single word in due to the eagerness of the other participants to speak. I was recently granted a general class license. The thinking being that perhaps DX (international contacts) and local nets on the HF bands might provide a better experience. However, now that I have gotten my license and am looking at the investment involved in getting a radio and a 40m dipole set up in a suburban area - I find myself wondering about the value that it would provide to me. Additionally, I've read that the sunspot cycle is at an all time low. My limited understanding of ionospheric radio propogation is that many of the shorter wavelength bands (that use more reasonably sized dipoles) can be marginal without high gain antennas and high transmission power levels at this point in the solar cycle. I'm going to cut off my post here. I look forward to hearing the advice of others - even if only tangentially related. -Jason White --=20 Jason White --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .