Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 04:49:03 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 08DBdMYb007543; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 07:39:51 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.15]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 08DBdL1s007540 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 07:39:21 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE2.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.18]) by outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 08DBdCZo004333 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 07:39:21 -0400 Received: from w92exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.112) by oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 07:39:02 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.60) by w92exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 07:39:04 -0400 Received: from NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.59.177) by oc11exhyb1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 07:39:04 -0400 Received: from MWHPR15CA0035.namprd15.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:ad::21) by BL0PR0102MB3601.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:207:35::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.16; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 11:39:03 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM03FT053.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:ad:cafe::fd) by MWHPR15CA0035.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:300:ad::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.16 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 11:39:03 +0000 Received: from mail-lj1-f175.google.com (209.85.208.175) by CO1NAM03FT053.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.81.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.16 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 11:39:03 +0000 Received: by mail-lj1-f175.google.com with SMTP id b19so16127813lji.11 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 04:39:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan Pearce To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2020 04:38:49 -0700 Subject: Re: [ARM] Nvidia to buy ARM Thread-Topic: [ARM] Nvidia to buy ARM Thread-Index: AdaJw+E60g/9p+CaRIKP+Ht9gO+yiw== Message-ID: References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: TempError X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of googlemail.com designates 209.85.208.175 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.208.175; helo=mail-lj1-f175.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=KOe6uRcagsHavEpxV3bMyAACb7ByovmocfBhPIUxEYs=; b=XrJp/J9JF2tifGHVG/3RdRwZB76KD8Ks203mmHW6/0HyVecQ42tcn3VWOEx66kXeo2 np/6p0VTEu4CRiCZ6hmQdo8DVdQqFv5AzKCSF4vWmvVPXEfBTPpY9OCCVabBv8Ex7x21 nc0JSBtjsM2/D7qhcYp0lO0cpARaWtQ8N5aUqS2XK+aks2QvvyAZzxmMjwNSdfYISHTP I35o/s6Frww4eHgA5xawpGPkk6heeOISb1waJy6GjY4DYZUhBYHZaU9SdFzj1yBbZsjp f69jhrEWI3ygh8oA0kz6KdaCMKtR0asLPGmmAJBYdaNBixDOETMT4VLTAAih3f4GhHvX YvHw== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.208.175) smtp.mailfrom=googlemail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=googlemail.com;mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=googlemail.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a2e:810a:: with SMTP id d10mr3720250ljg.302.1599997140873; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 04:39:00 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [ARM] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 > Sigh. I suppose that's better than Qualcomm. Or the Chinese, that would kill a lot of products in the phone market ... On Sun, 13 Sep 2020 at 04:53, Bob Blick wrote: > > https://www.reuters.com/article/us-arm-holdings-m-a-nvidia/nvidia-nears-d= eal-to-buy-chip-designer-arm-for-more-than-40-billion-sources-say-idUSKBN26= 30UE > > Sigh. I suppose that's better than Qualcomm. > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .