Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 02:06:55 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 08C8vafZ015023; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 04:57:40 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-7.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.58]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 08C8vZfL015020 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 04:57:36 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE2.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.18]) by outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 08C8vZwS005144 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 04:57:35 -0400 Received: from w92expo33.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.45) by oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 04:57:33 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb3.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.99) by w92expo33.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 04:57:35 -0400 Received: from NAM04-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.74.48) by oc11exhyb3.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 04:57:33 -0400 Received: from MWHPR14CA0070.namprd14.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:81::32) by DM6PR01MB4057.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:5:2e::30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.17; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 08:57:31 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM03FT060.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:81:cafe::d9) by MWHPR14CA0070.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:300:81::32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.16 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 08:57:30 +0000 Received: from mail-pj1-f45.google.com (209.85.216.45) by CO1NAM03FT060.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.81.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.16 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 08:57:30 +0000 Received: by mail-pj1-f45.google.com with SMTP id mm21so2885692pjb.4 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 01:57:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Justin Richards To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 01:57:14 -0700 Subject: [EE]: OpAmp Max differential input voltage GL358 Thread-Topic: [EE]: OpAmp Max differential input voltage GL358 Thread-Index: AdaI5BBF27bGm4zDSryXjqT8pYkMhg== Message-ID: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.216.45 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.216.45; helo=mail-pj1-f45.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=lUJLHRZM1ts1FK5ro3org2HuWqmjympQdsx8kQdaWWs=; b=Q4FQHCqCWkW/LLLfZNi/nNX/UVPQXfY7hQjwEZ1Kh14OHHl6GZInuMEsFNSYCPWNuq 97WlBtko4Dq7PqIkyrgbIbCXp2bSA6yVAqGCz5muHcyIRlmMrJnMkFkg6pe1kL+IRanC 962UZXL07TxhsyXNwGpENEQGPkd1grRhA4Epa0mjTm2z93roxcMZKTKbrnPbQdl7xNAR S2JbrqBarrMpVOQum0thhEinHM7uY94KADzFVFIrOw7teOi9oH21aANlTcN7ObtnfFJd JFalEZjToOAzOcdrZ7Vsf/1MTE49HW6Lg2flV5wgW82GP1BHNGDEUw9j6Y1YUvHgK4ae DJ3g== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.216.45) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a17:90b:707:: with SMTP id s7mr3264760pjz.25.1599901049342; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 01:57:29 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [EE] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Experimenting with using a ESP8266 as a soldering iron PID controller driving the ADC with the output of an opamp. The GL358 opamp datasheet specifies max differential input voltage as 32V. I would like to know if that is as it sounds and I can force the inputs to have a max of 32v across them with a single supply to the Opamp of +5V. I am still learning about opamps and thought the inputs were to be considered as a virtual ground and they will effectively be at the same potential but here i would be brute forcing a voltage across them and concerned it may be damaging and bad practice. The GL358 (was in the junk box) is configured as a dual amp to amplify the thermocouple (integral part of soldering tip) output of approx 2mV - 8mV (~30oC - 400oC) .to approx 40mV - 1500mV. One side of the thermocouple is grounded and connected via a resistor to the inverting input while the other side is connected via another resistor to the non-inverting input. I plan to measure temperature then apply 24V across the thermocouple. which will drive 24V across the two 1k ohm opamp input resistors. As a caution I plan to have back to back diodes at the inputs to limit the voltage across them to approx 0.7v. But back to the original question, are the protection diodes needed given a maximum differential voltage of 32 volts or is that only if the supply is also at 32V. I found a design that disconnects the thermocouple from the opamp during heating but not sure if that is actually required and obviously simplifies the design if not. Regards Justin --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .