Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 22:41:52 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 08A5W8na002300; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 01:32:22 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-7.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.58]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 08A5W71g002296 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 01:32:07 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE1.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.17]) by outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 08A5W68U001486 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 01:32:07 -0400 Received: from w92expo19.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.73) by oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 01:32:04 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.112) by w92expo19.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 01:32:06 -0400 Received: from NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.55.100) by oc11exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 01:32:06 -0400 Received: from DM5PR20CA0025.namprd20.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:13d::11) by SN6PR01MB4560.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:805:f0::23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3326.25; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 05:32:03 +0000 Received: from DM3NAM03FT014.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:13d:cafe::4a) by DM5PR20CA0025.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:3:13d::11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.16 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 05:32:03 +0000 Received: from NAM04-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (40.92.10.74) by DM3NAM03FT014.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.82.81) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.16 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 05:32:03 +0000 Received: from BN6PR11CA0037.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:404:4b::23) by DM6PR13MB2345.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:be::22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.11; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 05:32:02 +0000 Received: from BN7NAM10FT058.eop-nam10.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:404:4b:cafe::fe) by BN6PR11CA0037.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:404:4b::23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.16 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 05:32:01 +0000 Received: from BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e8f::53) by BN7NAM10FT058.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e8f::161) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.16 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 05:32:01 +0000 Received: from BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b8bc:100b:de02:82f]) by BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b8bc:100b:de02:82f%6]) with mapi id 15.20.3348.019; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 05:32:01 +0000 From: Bob Blick To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 22:32:01 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] Microwave Oven Transformers Thread-Topic: [EE] Microwave Oven Transformers Thread-Index: AQHWWTDTdgLEYlLB80CMUa8aGORcYqkGGn2AgALBCRuAAAiKAIAABfHzgAAGgQCAAARH4YAAEa8AgAAJWtGABN8wPoBTsie4gAAF54CAAASNGw== Message-ID: References: , List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of outlook.com designates 40.92.10.74 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=40.92.10.74; helo=NAM04-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=yfJC/v8vc3EYK5Naddrm/F0Vm42/ub4px5AsXgl54jI=; b=QTr2LteLVKD+VQDYIYtfnvbMDcLOznHXtm7VC0lku5dUnvkb4/E2WtEG411BOZl0vj9VRxq6Ah23OTJa/qEhkOgEaPnEj+K9ztEbVCUL6+9jYmmCckO7U9/ybam/E7t7rThRK8J/GuuaPIy0O6nBvI7QiNFho3FqMiCs7NOcfjlxh5+aNZ5+B0IjPA8q0+eevfPR7z8PfMBhxMa9rkcwguQ27sFJnI+j2m/eZL5BzaptudTOgjlMZydBbwMW+iNaHnWZgWgcpvqMxD/RiMuZcfB89kS/Hl3xGMX4xX1vdvvGVvpiVZBI9GaQRWDPCor7Tgbpeavd0ydqN0DJjCZzPw== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 40.92.10.74) smtp.mailfrom=outlook.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=outlook.com; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=outlook.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-topics: [EE] x-mime-autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by PCH.mit.edu id 08A5W71g002296 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi Ryan, I needed an inductor good for over 100 amps. One of my welders is a tiny thing as small as a lunch box. It's very conven= ient and efficient but doesn't like cellulosic electrodes, I want to see if= adding inductance in series improves things. More likely, it will kill my = welder after it kills the MOVs I add as protection :) There's very little real information available about why inverter-based wel= ders usually don't work well with cellulosic electrodes. A lot of talk abou= t open-circuit voltage not being high enough. That's clearly wrong, since t= he open-circuit voltage only affects the starting of the arc, and the probl= em here is the arc dying out. Cellulosic electrodes produce a lot of hydrog= en, which does raise the arc voltage slightly, but it should be well within= the welder's capability. I've run the welder on both 120 and 240 volts to = see if that changes things, and it doesn't, which it would if the arc volta= ge was the problem. I think the real problem is the current limiting in the= welder getting confused by the aggressive percussive arc that cellulosic r= ods produce. There is a whitepaper by ESAB(a welding equipment manufacturer) about the t= opic, and they suggest that inverter-based welders need large inductors in = order to use cellulosic electrodes. So that fits in with my hypothesis. Even if it works out, the inductor probably won't become part of the welder= , since it weighs as much as the whole welder. Just a little work avoidance= exercise here in my little corner of the hobby-sphere. Friendly regards, Bob ________________________________________ From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu on behalf of Ryan O= 'Connor Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 9:42 PM To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Subject: Re: [EE] Microwave Oven Transformers That's not many turns. What are you going to use it for? --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .