Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 08:58:30 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 088FmnMi032001; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 11:49:04 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.15]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 088Fmlww031998 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 11:48:47 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE2.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.18]) by outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 088FmkYe013534 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 11:48:47 -0400 Received: from oc11expo31.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.104) by oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 11:48:04 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb5.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.110) by oc11expo31.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 11:48:21 -0400 Received: from NAM12-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.55.168) by oc11exhyb5.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.110) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 11:48:21 -0400 Received: from DM6PR13CA0026.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:bc::39) by BL0PR0102MB3348.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:207:35::31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3326.25; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:48:14 +0000 Received: from DM3NAM03FT024.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:bc:cafe::20) by DM6PR13CA0026.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:5:bc::39) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.9 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:48:14 +0000 Received: from NAM11-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (40.92.19.42) by DM3NAM03FT024.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.82.182) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3348.16 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:48:14 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM11FT055.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:3861::52) by CO1NAM11HT246.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:3861::103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3326.21; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:48:13 +0000 Received: from BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:3861::4e) by CO1NAM11FT055.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:3861::385) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3326.19 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:48:13 +0000 Received: from BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b8bc:100b:de02:82f]) by BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b8bc:100b:de02:82f%6]) with mapi id 15.20.3348.019; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:48:13 +0000 From: Bob Blick To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 08:48:12 -0700 Subject: Re: [OT]:: Likelihood of car alternator fault being due to worn field winding brushes? Thread-Topic: [OT]:: Likelihood of car alternator fault being due to worn field winding brushes? Thread-Index: AQHWheq1nfcMSetOXEiB/Z9q0URd2ale4P/2 Message-ID: References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of outlook.com designates 40.92.19.42 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=40.92.19.42; helo=NAM11-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=dQFyRchkUjL/xTgmFRfgrUiIB/B+Lg1RuNcrnp/+9S4=; b=pCMzklgejJ1At2KLvysHSEZQtKxKBfykm36/t/KW/xCBFJQQGvsTy68keWv3GDRilBfNZjphNqL5fcSyq7PInILYnZohc9qkKP7I5kDTzYok0ZGECRukNlxb5zVipO9dCJAMJF0sLvCY3KEfxUXbeS+VIjd5Fw5xIuZd6ebeRkrEWS7fX4OJZJ7mhK3dXww7xQoHOIOK8rpzbTOliVzUSAjArVfp2Pix/owRcX+7Um4IWH+NXZHTTGr2+RbLDe0t2uV7cVQ7CMkhtD58sqlLjmY34afmvsP3QlU/Ga1MatAe9c/aorscBYdCgNJ7lGqazGRzsb31AgHKguG7uI7FDQ== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 40.92.19.42) smtp.mailfrom=outlook.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=outlook.com; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=outlook.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-topics: [OT] x-mime-autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by PCH.mit.edu id 088Fmlww031998 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi Russell, If the brushes have gone bad, it's quite likely that other damage has or wi= ll soon happen to the alternator. Since it's a closed loop system, the regu= lator is going to try to maintain current, so there might be arcing and exc= ess heat which can damage the slip rings and potentially the regulator itse= lf. Not saying that's what's happening here, but just fyi. The damage to th= e slip rings isn't going to be as bad as what happens in a motor with a slo= tted commutator, you can probably clean it up good enough to get a few more= years before the new brush is gobbled up. Cheers, Bob ________________________________________ From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu on behalf of Russel= lMc=20 Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 7:03 AM To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Subject: [OT]:: Likelihood of car alternator fault being due to worn field = winding brushes? *TL;DR: If a 2001 Toyota Corolla alternator is faulty, how likely it is that the field winding brushes have gone open circuit?* It's reasonably likely that the alternator is the original one. ___________________ My son's 2001 Toyota Corolla has stopped charging its battery. The battery holds charge and the alternator does not draw substantial current when off. Indications are that the alternator system is dead. It seems likely that there has not been a diode short circuit as in my experience these draw substantial battery current. A mechanic will remove and replace the alternator at an acceptable price. Alternator replacement is acceptable if necessary. *Can anyone suggest how likely it is that the field winding brushes have gone open circuit?* For various reasons I'm not inclined to do alternator diode replacements or other repairs but if brush failure was the cause then a repair sounds liable to be a sensible solution. Russell McMahon -- --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .