Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 11:38:08 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 087IRZWS014905; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 14:28:02 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-5.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.59]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 087IRXAs014902 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 14:27:34 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE2.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.18]) by outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 087IRXdF021082 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 14:27:33 -0400 Received: from w92expo31.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.43) by oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 14:27:16 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb5.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.110) by w92expo31.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.43) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 14:27:33 -0400 Received: from NAM11-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.57.170) by oc11exhyb5.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.110) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 14:27:33 -0400 Received: from MWHPR13CA0013.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:16::23) by BYAPR01MB4710.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:a03:83::25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3348.19; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 18:27:31 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM03FT011.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:16:cafe::17) by MWHPR13CA0013.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:300:16::23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.9 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 18:27:31 +0000 Received: from mail-ej1-f41.google.com (209.85.218.41) by CO1NAM03FT011.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.80.87) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3348.16 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 18:27:31 +0000 Received: by mail-ej1-f41.google.com with SMTP id q13so19237950ejo.9 for ; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 11:27:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Sean Breheny To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 11:27:17 -0700 Subject: Re: [OT] World's brightest LED Thread-Topic: [OT] World's brightest LED Thread-Index: AdaFRgimRTyCHCQjQguc/v7+T99NPQ== Message-ID: References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.218.41 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.218.41; helo=mail-ej1-f41.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cornell.edu; s=g.20171207; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=DmM9LLR1RW5dpDLl/EP+1yPqTLuvDm7kUV+Ocm46A8w=; b=gu+/MBUD1vNApe4+hMcAqEIE2nKDQGt9NZQJKVygcrt/Vrm3HOzMXY4KkjGJpDAll1 IuzcC04j5UcT68iqMn2clvZjqrj+LhRgXJXOesFAiOSRHeL8d2YTQtPZ3zvP6iaB9zWa coSRMBlLnTtxYIh8hNBeIbwsg7H8dUgXN/iB+yXlCBFGasG2cCy3qTR1dmSHgpZ+S1pF sC9009nKbrg58hH05qqKCgj0osm/+O80H6bukLe2rVlDRUIyjaKwcqv2nqUnQ8Yfa8+P BXiTQMWEqYqdWCw8e29/qfMi8+YbudiwNh4QfnYzN4Ui3daSQX26y1JQlHspn/yl28gQ fYCA== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.218.41) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=cornell.edu; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cornell.edu; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a17:906:a2d2:: with SMTP id by18mr21972111ejb.37.1599503249099; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 11:27:29 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [OT] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 This appears to be the manufacturer page for this LED: https://store.yujiintl.com/products/yujileds-bc-series-high-cri-cob-led-900= h-1500w-pack-1pcs It has a forward voltage of between 30 and 41V which means that it must be an array of LEDs. As such, I'm not sure what is meant by "world's brightest single-unit LED". I find it hard to believe that nobody makes a more powerful single module (containing multiple LED junctions) especially since this company is one I've never heard of before and is not in the top ten global manufacturers of either LED dies, LED modules, or LED lighting assemblies. Also, the manufacturer itself links to this guy's video on the page for this LED :) Sean On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 6:53 AM Alan Pearce wrote: > > He (surprisingly) does not show what the beam is actually like. > > Yeah, I was wondering how it would focus using the lens from a high > beam headlight from a vehicle which had separate low and high beam > lights, or maybe the lens from a driving headlamp. > > These were about the only lens I could think of that would be large > enough to capture the beam. > > I did like his use of aluminium tape on the clamps. I presume these > were plastic seeing he had 3D printed them, but you didn't actually > see them without the tape on. > > On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 04:19, RussellMc wrote: > > > > On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 08:58, Ryan O'Connor wrote: > > > > > I stumbled across the world's brightest single cell LED light on > youtube > > > and immediately decided I had to share it with Russel, but then > realised if > > > he is interested in LEDs then other people on here will be too: > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DbBV-1VNWscA > > > > > > Fun & interesting. > > He (surprisingly) does not show what the beam is actually like. > > I didn't note any claims on lumen output, but it should be well over > > 100,000 lumen. > > > > Note to self: Find out brand of power supplies used and avoid buying > them. > > -- > > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > > View/change your membership options at > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .