Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 17:07:13 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 086NvYVe027055; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 19:57:51 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.15]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 086NvXIx027052 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 19:57:33 -0400 Received: from w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.15]) by outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 086NvWDS024114 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 19:57:32 -0400 Received: from OC11EXPO27.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.98) by w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 19:57:01 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.112) by OC11EXPO27.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 19:57:32 -0400 Received: from NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.70.100) by oc11exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 19:57:32 -0400 Received: from MWHPR07CA0023.namprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:116::33) by CY4PR01MB2279.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:903:23::9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3326.23; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 23:57:31 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM03FT027.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:116:cafe::7c) by MWHPR07CA0023.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:300:116::33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3348.16 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 23:57:31 +0000 Received: from NAM02-BL2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (40.92.3.25) by CO1NAM03FT027.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.80.161) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3348.16 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 23:57:30 +0000 Received: from SN1NAM02FT005.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.72.55) by SN1NAM02HT107.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.73.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3348.17; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 23:57:28 +0000 Received: from BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e44::53) by SN1NAM02FT005.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e44::117) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3348.17 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 23:57:28 +0000 Received: from BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b8bc:100b:de02:82f]) by BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b8bc:100b:de02:82f%6]) with mapi id 15.20.3348.019; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 23:57:28 +0000 From: Bob Blick To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2020 16:57:28 -0700 Subject: Re: [OT] Simple LiPo charging circuit Thread-Topic: [OT] Simple LiPo charging circuit Thread-Index: AQHWgbKpK1K5gi4LYE6z8WIcpSqJvalW2g2AgADn7QCAAAp0gIAALe0AgAABEACAAAxj9IAAFCAAgAASN4CAA7HNUYAAPG2AgAAHSoyAAAWzAIAACFCAgAAbplE= Message-ID: References: <20200904030306.GA30954@laptop.org> <7d0c7aa5-e974-9e82-015e-2e3501768c5d@gmail.com> <20200904060223.GC30954@laptop.org> <6e6855d8-1672-c321-c397-0459849c1da3@gmail.com> <20200906214046.GA25057@laptop.org>, List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of outlook.com designates 40.92.3.25 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=40.92.3.25; helo=NAM02-BL2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ckaF5zBGWd3FjhMMH3+0kOpWsflRhI0nA44HaOapPww=; b=pkpQX7MmikuDs+hoJfwoEIu8mxK4CAXsLNBVGWOhLftw84ycSDc2i3rZBw/MuqqedTREoawjnbSB/gABlBK6z5j1zJIWWipwtsmq3PEz3pijXkdbycq11cxI4oCc2qgpkY4AqobRZaD9VivRr1L04U458o4fXaGGqQE/uQwprerpBaDzVjQ/xz6jadK8WNO1DKioV7ldDl/FmC08QpASDgEwSJflLLMIJwmkU7c8lv4kBWof6EBJ+iW6ruurLrnI62ri0rGiLdG0Gih/3yLTeeaplA0gP9uLyWEcUMAexnUA4EX5UBMdaQdX3vO0ypDD4K9EOEmYTodKzCsAOcHYCQ== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 40.92.3.25) smtp.mailfrom=outlook.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=outlook.com; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=outlook.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-topics: [OT] x-mime-autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by PCH.mit.edu id 086NvXIx027052 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi Ryan, I think user behavior is the primary reason for short battery life. A frien= d of mine bought the same phone as my wife, yet his battery got pretty tire= d after two years, while hers was still strong when I got her a new phone a= fter four years use. Her battery care regime is pretty much to charge fully= when it got below 50%. And she always propped the phone on a pen or pencil= so it had airflow while charging(that was something I showed her). My frie= nd, on the other hand, was very haphazard when it came to caring for his ba= ttery. Friendly regards, Bob ________________________________________ From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu on behalf of Ryan O= 'Connor Sent: Sunday, September 6, 2020 3:10 PM To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Subject: Re: [OT] Simple LiPo charging circuit Sounds like smart phones are too smart now. I guess your old charger is reverting it back to the regular charging rate. From what I've read using a regular charge instead of fast charge does prolong the battery life but not by much. Usually a battery replacement isn't an expensive task anyway, it's going to wear out eventually regardless. On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 09:41, James Cameron wrote: > Not on this particular product, but I've been able to reduce fast > charge to slow charge by lowering the voltage. Simplest by adding a > USB extension cable in series. > > -- > James Cameron > http://quozl.netrek.org/ > - --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .