Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 14:36:17 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 086LRQt5009097; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 17:27:36 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.15]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 086LRPP9009094 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 17:27:25 -0400 Received: from w92exedge4.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE4.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.16]) by outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 086LROXW014293 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 17:27:25 -0400 Received: from w92exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.112) by w92exedge4.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 17:26:49 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb8.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.113) by w92exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 17:27:24 -0400 Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.58.108) by oc11exhyb8.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 17:27:23 -0400 Received: from DM5PR07CA0115.namprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:ae::44) by SN6PR01MB4942.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:805:b8::23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3348.19; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 21:27:23 +0000 Received: from DM3NAM03FT020.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:ae:cafe::7e) by DM5PR07CA0115.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:4:ae::44) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3348.16 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 21:27:22 +0000 Received: from NAM11-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (40.92.20.100) by DM3NAM03FT020.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.82.193) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3348.16 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 21:27:22 +0000 Received: from BN8NAM11FT033.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc4b::40) by BN8NAM11HT088.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc4b::330) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3326.19; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 21:27:22 +0000 Received: from BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc4b::50) by BN8NAM11FT033.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc4b::405) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3326.19 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 21:27:22 +0000 Received: from BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b8bc:100b:de02:82f]) by BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b8bc:100b:de02:82f%6]) with mapi id 15.20.3348.019; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 21:27:22 +0000 From: Bob Blick To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2020 14:27:21 -0700 Subject: Re: [OT] Simple LiPo charging circuit Thread-Topic: [OT] Simple LiPo charging circuit Thread-Index: AQHWgbKpK1K5gi4LYE6z8WIcpSqJvalW2g2AgADn7QCAAAp0gIAALe0AgAABEACAAAxj9IAAFCAAgAASN4CAA7HNUYAAPG2AgAAHSow= Message-ID: References: <6091de9f-23e5-b862-5cde-28e7450429d0@gmail.com> <20200904030306.GA30954@laptop.org> <7d0c7aa5-e974-9e82-015e-2e3501768c5d@gmail.com> <20200904060223.GC30954@laptop.org> <6e6855d8-1672-c321-c397-0459849c1da3@gmail.com> , List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of outlook.com designates 40.92.20.100 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=40.92.20.100; helo=NAM11-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=x3pCH8Y5hUcrG+u4NNiDeNPaUh/0zyYyN0xV0QocTZ8=; b=PK5T1n6jUKqrGAuHw3APppeAM4tC0Rg63oENYCAkn1b5zkhWT1ND7rDQq3pIRg0vm2MvXGL9s5Bbu3mOlIKk6nPD/B3oFd9SJb5ldlklJLrqTN7noek2MHN4IwAXzVguDjKYw5VkeWui9eDZxLjqmf6nJpdG4BOqndz9MZjMGT4nIl6uSDxJerZyqBNZECmUP6ifD4dzlPm/2AvWoerLxipHCvwf6iEe4Ipo7ide9ka2mcSPb0GkmfOd3HkgFNqQJuLwP8GU84SAEzP1zq+3iX1nvgMvGOAHCdGT4q0BwvaxmPROsyhG65m/jRGYi9nQgtChPToBBWnsEQDarTF9Sg== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 40.92.20.100) smtp.mailfrom=outlook.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=outlook.com; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=outlook.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-topics: [OT] x-mime-autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by PCH.mit.edu id 086LRPP9009094 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi Ryan, It's a Pixel 3A. The charger that came with it is USB-C and says 5V3A/9V2A.= There is nothing in settings to alter the charge rate. It definitely is a = fast charging phone. My previous phone, a Nexus-something, also had a high = voltage charger, but they are incompatible and default to slow charging wit= h the wrong charger. The battery is supposed to be 3000mAh. Best regards, Bob ________________________________________ From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu on behalf of Ryan O= 'Connor Sent: Sunday, September 6, 2020 1:54 PM To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Subject: Re: [OT] Simple LiPo charging circuit Bob, does your phone have a feature marketed as "fast charge"? As it may be set to that mode (in software), in which case it could be negatively impacting your battery life. It requires a fairly beefy charger of at least ~3000mAh. Ryan On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 05:34, Bob Blick wrote: > Hijacking the thread, I have a question about the battery in my mobile > phone. I'm careful about charging, and want to get as many useful years o= f > life as possible out of the battery. I try to never let the battery get t= oo > low, never charge the phone if it's hot, and never let it charge fully. > Based on the phone's gauge, I charge it when it's down to 40% and take it > off charge when it reaches 80 or 85%. I think this is probably a pretty > good way of doing it. I plug the charger into a timer so I don't have to > watch it, I'm not totally OCD :) > > My question regards preferred charging current. The charger that came wit= h > the phone will do my normal charge regime in about 20 minutes. The good > quality charger from a previous phone will take 90 minutes to do the same > thing. Neither charger noticeably heats the phone. > > Which is easier on the battery, high current for a short period of time, > or medium current for a longer time, both taking the battery from 40% to > 80% state of charge? > > Thanks, Bob > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .