Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 10:43:41 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 086HWjti012110; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 13:33:20 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.15]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 086HWiiI012107 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 13:32:44 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE2.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.18]) by outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 086HWh5N031276 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 13:32:44 -0400 Received: from oc11expo6.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.11) by oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 13:32:27 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.98) by oc11expo6.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 13:32:43 -0400 Received: from NAM12-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.55.174) by oc11exhyb2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 13:32:43 -0400 Received: from DM5PR19CA0061.namprd19.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:116::23) by MN2PR01MB5885.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:208:179::22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3348.16; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 17:32:42 +0000 Received: from DM3NAM03FT012.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:116:cafe::8c) by DM5PR19CA0061.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:3:116::23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3348.16 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 17:32:41 +0000 Received: from NAM02-BL2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (40.92.3.88) by DM3NAM03FT012.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.82.116) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3348.16 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 17:32:41 +0000 Received: from CY1NAM02FT004.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.74.51) by CY1NAM02HT227.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.74.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3348.17; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 17:32:40 +0000 Received: from BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e45::43) by CY1NAM02FT004.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e45::112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3348.17 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 17:32:40 +0000 Received: from BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b8bc:100b:de02:82f]) by BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b8bc:100b:de02:82f%6]) with mapi id 15.20.3348.019; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 17:32:40 +0000 From: Bob Blick To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2020 10:32:40 -0700 Subject: Re: [OT] Simple LiPo charging circuit Thread-Topic: [OT] Simple LiPo charging circuit Thread-Index: AQHWgbKpK1K5gi4LYE6z8WIcpSqJvalW2g2AgADn7QCAAAp0gIAALe0AgAABEACAAAxj9IAAFCAAgAASN4CAA7HNUQ== Message-ID: References: <6091de9f-23e5-b862-5cde-28e7450429d0@gmail.com> <20200904030306.GA30954@laptop.org> <7d0c7aa5-e974-9e82-015e-2e3501768c5d@gmail.com> <20200904060223.GC30954@laptop.org> <6e6855d8-1672-c321-c397-0459849c1da3@gmail.com> , List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of outlook.com designates 40.92.3.88 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=40.92.3.88; helo=NAM02-BL2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=rLUKV9cm3CNC4PGgGO4cJT5UZf9bvt3Zzfu32627Ypk=; b=izc13BaGHCc6srDh3YjCc4AgjwBX/8E1xWW53mMtX1scBy0JC1ob5aZuARWWYlw2LMfQdP3BbusuI/Cd2hn2KfLVEZ3f4oD2fYUVuxP6hTnDvtClDBFA3wF2QJZ5NQjrZNnHgOmffkFa6NmcNKqX+MGHFOuKvKI/GN5ORkis7H0HwUC2G4KU4ZCh2DJycicUf/Mf5/e8VSqKpGfom/yD3q+Lbrc7/9yeismbonHhO5nu4aV15S5aru+VhU+Se/5vseiGf0OXTptBNLCZpD5m2pTPcBvmkR+8eCsEnSSS5BnGZL6NWSjEftwWo+EOYTXCKkiZ53Mp2j3zekzsCLuT1A== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 40.92.3.88) smtp.mailfrom=outlook.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=outlook.com; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=outlook.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-topics: [OT] x-mime-autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by PCH.mit.edu id 086HWiiI012107 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hijacking the thread, I have a question about the battery in my mobile phon= e. I'm careful about charging, and want to get as many useful years of life= as possible out of the battery. I try to never let the battery get too low= , never charge the phone if it's hot, and never let it charge fully. Based = on the phone's gauge, I charge it when it's down to 40% and take it off cha= rge when it reaches 80 or 85%. I think this is probably a pretty good way o= f doing it. I plug the charger into a timer so I don't have to watch it, I'= m not totally OCD :) My question regards preferred charging current. The charger that came with = the phone will do my normal charge regime in about 20 minutes. The good qua= lity charger from a previous phone will take 90 minutes to do the same thin= g. Neither charger noticeably heats the phone. Which is easier on the battery, high current for a short period of time, or= medium current for a longer time, both taking the battery from 40% to 80% = state of charge? Thanks, Bob --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .