Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 19:36:22 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 0842Psxb004563; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 22:26:19 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-3.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.13]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 0842PqER004560 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 22:25:52 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE2.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.18]) by outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 0842PcMS016879 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 22:25:52 -0400 Received: from w92exhyb5.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.110) by oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 22:25:35 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.98) by w92exhyb5.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.110) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 22:25:48 -0400 Received: from NAM02-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.37.50) by oc11exhyb2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 22:25:47 -0400 Received: from MW3PR06CA0018.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:2a::23) by MW2PR0102MB3530.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:302:12::20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3326.25; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 02:25:45 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM03FT041.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:2a:cafe::42) by MW3PR06CA0018.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:303:2a::23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3348.15 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 02:25:45 +0000 Received: from mail-qv1-f43.google.com (209.85.219.43) by CO1NAM03FT041.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.81.163) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3348.16 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 02:25:45 +0000 Received: by mail-qv1-f43.google.com with SMTP id b13so2375349qvl.2 for ; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 19:25:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (104-222-118-43.cpe.teksavvy.com. [104.222.118.43]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q126sm3591715qkb.75.2020.09.03.19.25.42 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Sep 2020 19:25:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Jim Ruxton To: "piclist@mit.edu" Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 19:25:42 -0700 Subject: Re: [OT] Simple LiPo charging circuit Thread-Topic: [OT] Simple LiPo charging circuit Thread-Index: AdaCZC4fV4phi2XMTGudDFiPJfcjCQ== Message-ID: <6091de9f-23e5-b862-5cde-28e7450429d0@gmail.com> References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.219.43 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.219.43; helo=mail-qv1-f43.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=tv2GEpAPO6QZ8q1c9N8HipH9v30b9rSJsg/a1sJ9Ajs=; b=GGAM1O41hfVUsRNpq+RyKYMahUEFjHRi424LrHNmhNwb7tL5PtZXxWfwOMNyBPKIkq rbwpgK8E6Wf/EJIz2WMpEdkvMWyC8LcUwzbSuhmAa97jsBPTWZLDMSHWWgTsBccgTnsc T1DAsMdG72yx3gw5O8hlScHOWVMefdwrBkgSuLAULmF/zcihfS58shvL4AjMNvlVZHLa HnaP7TekF/qtZ2baqlrQ4QM0F7Kddu3l/HaSDHHl8trVSmBj4xA000WFtcxJeKMT0iWX AYI990QB36djm4+luGJbC5Z1sS/Z4D9Wtf/UtLJjTnwfyYd3cS0ZerFHbflmizcuUqKR X2gQ== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.219.43) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com; user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a05:6214:16cf:: with SMTP id d15mr5787870qvz.180.1599186343670; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 19:25:43 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [OT] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Thanks James and Russel for the posts. I hadn't considered that the=20 battery may have some integrated circuitry. There are no markings on the=20 battery so it's hard to know without dissecting it. I have ordered some=20 TP4056 modules so I'll give that a try when I replace the 180 mAH=20 nattery with a larger one. I greatly appreciate the advice. Cheers, Jim > > That is a good way to destroy the battery early or very early or very ver= y > early. > > I'll add this here after writing the material below first :-). > > An easy way to get a good result is to but a TP4056 module from > ebay/AliExpress/... . > These cost close enough to $0 to be hard to beat. > You can get ones with and without low battery cutoff. The with-cutoff > ones are a very good idea. > Distinguishable by some extra hardware and 4 output pads - Vout + - and > Battery + - > You get CCCV charging, CC rate settable and low battery discharge termina= te. > > They seem to have got even cheaper than when I last bought some. > This page has both types as above - plus it seems mini/micro/type C USB > power input connectors. > Example only - not a recommendation - but seems as good as most. YMMV. > > https://www.aliexpress.com/item/4000061318186.html? > > They also offer a version with a switchmode converter allowing a higher V= in > (typically up to about 18V rather than the 6V or so for TP4056) > > > ________________________ > > Simple methods are used "because they can". > The cell MAY have an internal BMS to sort-of protect it. > MAy. > ________________________ > > LiPo / LiIon should be charged by CC to Vmax with *immediate* terminate, > or, more usually, CCCV with CC to Vmax, and CV to some CC/N value. N=3D2 = 2 is > a good charge, n=3D4 is heavyish and N=3D10 is "road warrior". > > CC only at mA =3D cell_mAh with immediate terminate at Vmax gives 89-90% = of > max capacity and > CC at mA =3D mAh_cell/2 gives 90%+ of max capacity. > Immediate terminate at V=3DVmax gives significant gain in cycle life and > whole of life mAh. > > Lowering Vmax slightly gives significant increase in cycle life and whol= e > of life mAh. > > FWIW - nobody wants to do it - setting Vmax to about 3.85V (from memory) > allows Mars Rovers to get about 8000 cycles with LiIon. Capacity (from > memory) is about 50% of max. > > > Russell > > > > >> >> --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .