Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 17:58:40 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 07U0nuJ1017367; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 20:50:18 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-7.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.58]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 07U0nsFN017362 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 20:49:55 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE2.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.18]) by outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 07U0nsdE018326 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 20:49:54 -0400 Received: from w92expo14.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.68) by oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 20:49:45 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb5.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.110) by w92expo14.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.68) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 20:49:54 -0400 Received: from NAM12-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.55.177) by oc11exhyb5.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.110) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 20:49:53 -0400 Received: from DM5PR10CA0018.namprd10.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:2::28) by MWHPR01MB2846.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:300:100::10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3326.19; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 00:49:53 +0000 Received: from DM3NAM03FT025.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:2:cafe::c9) by DM5PR10CA0018.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:4:2::28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3326.19 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 00:49:52 +0000 Received: from NAM12-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (40.92.21.61) by DM3NAM03FT025.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.82.181) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3326.19 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 00:49:52 +0000 Received: from DM6NAM12FT033.eop-nam12.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc64::47) by DM6NAM12HT075.eop-nam12.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc64::420) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3348.7; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 00:49:51 +0000 Received: from BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc64::4d) by DM6NAM12FT033.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc64::270) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3348.7 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 00:49:51 +0000 Received: from BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b8bc:100b:de02:82f]) by BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b8bc:100b:de02:82f%6]) with mapi id 15.20.3305.032; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 00:49:51 +0000 From: Bob Blick To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 17:49:51 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] High Side LCD Backlight Control Thread-Topic: [EE] High Side LCD Backlight Control Thread-Index: AQHWfkYT+aatstZL3EC3/x1C4cLn+KlP0MNm Message-ID: References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of outlook.com designates 40.92.21.61 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=40.92.21.61; helo=NAM12-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=R8Ulk2skxGjP+EEyw7zxtKLtiluEPUar/MVz0MoEp74=; b=A2yd1+zVwyW/oFpxaUodThyfUumaPtzofkiiKYsc0qvBdrDNSLyI0621uPcjPEhbGW8osIKhnkC83PKKFGay+JN4e/8VSxrhjCStt7xqy9yPoN2H6r36Zd5Q9BPS2obg/Vorh3QpG+t3IvlFmkvv2vysZ/YSZQzRXEp+rDb1laNR++9upzYj89Yu0RLRupSZPLJhlcJ8IIkIs/rjLf32GqauN8EGtYXqBV+m2qb49VJ8kz5EiovKADmVMadIYa8dWmQg/qOvhRDDP4m6AfxYepI31WXoorIlnWhmNFjn/ZpGgRRnWpekqUfPbyVxDdF5a2sTvJmtw05oORzeZWERwg== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 40.92.21.61) smtp.mailfrom=outlook.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=outlook.com; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=outlook.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-topics: [EE] x-mime-autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by PCH.mit.edu id 07U0nsFN017362 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi Josh, Simplest is a P-channel Mosfet, recommend something from Alpha and Omega Se= miconductor, part number AO3-something. Cheapest solution is probably a PNP transistor with a base resistor. Either will be fine. Hard to say which I'd choose. Both will invert, so 0 i= s ON. Cheerful regards, Bob ________________________________________ From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu on behalf of Josh K= offman Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2020 1:42 PM To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Subject: [EE] High Side LCD Backlight Control Repost with topic tag - I am so ashamed... Hi all, I'm working on a small project that uses a graphic LCD. I'd like to be able to control the backlight (possibly PWM for brightness). On this module the backlight ground is tied to the module ground, so I can't switch the low side. The backlight runs at 3.3V and maxes out at about 50mA. A bit of extra capacity might be nice just in case I ever size up a bit on the screen. What would be a good way to handle this? Space will be a bit limited so fewer parts would be better, and this is a low volume thing so I'm happy to spend a bit more on a transistor if it means fewer external parts. 3.3V is definitely not my area of expertise when it comes to switching, so any help would be appreciated. Thank you! Josh -- A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools. -Douglas Adams --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .