Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 11:56:28 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 07TImZbC004478; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 14:48:46 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-3.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.13]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 07TImX8K004474 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 14:48:33 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE2.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.18]) by outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 07TImDGi022976 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 14:48:33 -0400 Received: from oc11expo9.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.14) by oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 14:48:15 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb5.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.110) by oc11expo9.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 14:48:23 -0400 Received: from NAM02-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.37.56) by oc11exhyb5.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.110) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 14:48:23 -0400 Received: from MWHPR2001CA0008.namprd20.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:301:15::18) by BN3PR01MB1955.prod.exchangelabs.com (2a01:111:e400:c5f2::24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3326.23; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 18:48:20 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM03FT010.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:301:15:cafe::98) by MWHPR2001CA0008.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:301:15::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3326.19 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 18:48:20 +0000 Received: from mail-yb1-f178.google.com (209.85.219.178) by CO1NAM03FT010.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.80.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3326.19 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 18:48:20 +0000 Received: by mail-yb1-f178.google.com with SMTP id h20so1603924ybj.8 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 11:48:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Manu Abraham To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 11:48:07 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] Looking for higher-voltage version of 2N4401 Thread-Topic: [EE] Looking for higher-voltage version of 2N4401 Thread-Index: AdZ+NhozIyXav99+TD6CoUUaYC+d+w== Message-ID: References: <41fe48b6404d497508bcd599345d8db7@mtlp000083> List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: <41fe48b6404d497508bcd599345d8db7@mtlp000083> Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.219.178 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.219.178; helo=mail-yb1-f178.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=kl78py7dXVvvw6hZAxauzKhdJU3fdyeynhWXOuIfqPo=; b=vCJ7umHTZfUn8Jp6uRXwjCvVGbCAbWC40Hb+sjEmRe/OfnybYa7bbAlX+j7G8rl0Zm IVgTH4TwMtZJmHxqXkGbrREmL/PZplgn+/l52XTejMks+0+pqUGsigIcol6C+IaT1/Cq XfUC7yuJFdk01iIpk0CVc4THt+T/349vQigzEKb6OimwOpzt/B5yl00kfEX4I8Tmr/xr vVAuukXli9iEhcyH2uO+UUHGyk5clhrjbQSXe4ttMhDa+yvcuKw4RXt04q+8cKwRb7uz Piz43/LcI42qkT2ABUaLFrfeItHXV0thsdb2CPvmOjU+xLwe05DQEndOBm1u3SjCaF3e 9xYg== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.219.178) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a25:1fd5:: with SMTP id f204mr10521024ybf.236.1598726896391; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 11:48:16 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [EE] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi Dwayne, How about the 2N5401 ? Vceo=3D150V, Ic max=3D600mA, hFE=3D40-200 I was able to get it for about 0.05USD, locally over here. Cheers, Manu On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 4:45 AM Dwayne Reid wrote: > > Good day to all. > > I'm looking for an inexpensive jelly-bean transistor similar to > 2n4401 but with minimum 60V rating. Of particular importance is that > the DC current gain exceed 200 with collector current of about 1 mA. > > I've been going through the many choices at Digikey but I'm finding > that although many suitable transistors have decent gain at fairly > high currents (100 mA and up), they have sucky gain at low currents > (1mA or so). > > I'd prefer to stay with a North American part number (2Nxxxx) but > would absolutely consider others. > > Prefer something fairly robust, similar to the 2N4401. Decent > current rating, in other words. > > Suggestions gratefully accepted! > > Many thanks! > > dwayne > > -- > Dwayne Reid > Trinity Electronics Systems Ltd Edmonton, AB, CANADA > 780-489-3199 voice 780-487-6397 fax 888-489-3199 Toll Free > www.trinity-electronics.com > Custom Electronics Design and Manufacturing > > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .