Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 05:59:00 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 07TCoC3b021673; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 08:50:36 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-5.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.59]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 07TCoAQU021666 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 08:50:11 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE1.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.17]) by outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 07TCo4tg017648 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 08:50:11 -0400 Received: from oc11expo7.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.12) by oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 08:49:49 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb5.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.110) by oc11expo7.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 08:50:05 -0400 Received: from NAM02-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.37.53) by oc11exhyb5.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.110) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 08:50:04 -0400 Received: from DM5PR19CA0022.namprd19.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:151::32) by BL0PR01MB4321.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:208:37::26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3283.15; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 12:50:03 +0000 Received: from DM3NAM03FT054.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:151:cafe::17) by DM5PR19CA0022.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:3:151::32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3326.19 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 12:50:03 +0000 Received: from mail-lf1-f47.google.com (209.85.167.47) by DM3NAM03FT054.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.83.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3326.19 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 12:50:03 +0000 Received: by mail-lf1-f47.google.com with SMTP id q8so1108800lfb.6 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 05:50:03 -0700 (PDT) From: "Forrest Christian (List Account)" To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 06:00:24 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] Looking for higher-voltage version of 2N4401 Thread-Topic: [EE] Looking for higher-voltage version of 2N4401 Thread-Index: AdZ+BCrS8TB30GKiTkC33Pq3/c88Jw== Message-ID: References: <41fe48b6404d497508bcd599345d8db7@mtlp000083> List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: <41fe48b6404d497508bcd599345d8db7@mtlp000083> Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of packetflux.com designates 209.85.167.47 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.167.47; helo=mail-lf1-f47.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=packetflux-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=txYSVkqbc0Mct/HnsiIra6U26ZwqEWemzsGdjjigQ/U=; b=Bnd46KuodlgjvXsQrL4uBcBqmPW53NA+Yw5TLaggQPzO9ICgRPJWuuPZI6P5ilF9fs vbhzZH5qi2b8D4ubDF2IwHKk3nrT1Hp3K6Df1FzcQ4PS8jWoJaJyv1qo2TlWOWtQPB57 Wv19YFU0P85WoocFsuCt1FAGPH55w4NUYrPZRfgY3L200FO8wh0pZ1V5nUZC+haABjIX fua9mSEN+Wnx0YoBUaAB6FNQx/MLEkvHwnI3djtCf3q6xxYulXc+6CSUTZhczRFDLKqe Rt8X8DPnbRwN3FQCdvt5yvsIUJJQzP7wuCEgV9zOXwmu5zweEePgQey44mLjmKnR3phy Ikhw== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.167.47) smtp.mailfrom=packetflux.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=packetflux-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; mit.edu; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=packetflux.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a05:6512:36cd:: with SMTP id e13mr1526795lfs.165.1598705401494; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 05:50:01 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [EE] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 A darlington such as the MPSA29 would strictly fit your stated requirements but I don't know if you'd find the darlington gain to be way too high. On Fri, Aug 28, 2020, 5:23 PM Dwayne Reid wrote: > Good day to all. > > I'm looking for an inexpensive jelly-bean transistor similar to > 2n4401 but with minimum 60V rating. Of particular importance is that > the DC current gain exceed 200 with collector current of about 1 mA. > > I've been going through the many choices at Digikey but I'm finding > that although many suitable transistors have decent gain at fairly > high currents (100 mA and up), they have sucky gain at low currents > (1mA or so). > > I'd prefer to stay with a North American part number (2Nxxxx) but > would absolutely consider others. > > Prefer something fairly robust, similar to the 2N4401. Decent > current rating, in other words. > > Suggestions gratefully accepted! > > Many thanks! > > dwayne > > -- > Dwayne Reid > Trinity Electronics Systems Ltd Edmonton, AB, CANADA > 780-489-3199 voice 780-487-6397 fax 888-489-3199 Toll Free > www.trinity-electronics.com > Custom Electronics Design and Manufacturing > > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .